Originally posted by Damborgson
He wouldn't be after Kurse did it.And I'm not playing the pretend to be stupid game with you 👆 you know well enough what's meant, and if not, well that's a personal problem...
Funny, eh? I'd bet being stronger than Superman by that margin would place Wraith above Kurse too.
mmm
Originally posted by DamborgsonWhy do you believe that Kurse is stronger than Clark? What's the basis for this? And why do you value strength far more than speed, perceiving things in slow motion or still motion, hv, and flight all put together?
He wouldn't be after Kurse did it.And I'm not playing the pretend to be stupid game with you 👆 you know well enough what's meant, and if not, well that's a personal problem...
Originally posted by abhilegend
Wraith was 3-4 times stronger than Superman too if you see the way he absorbed sunlight and the amount of time he did absorb that.Funny, eh? I'd bet being stronger than Superman by that margin would place Wraith above Kurse too.
mmm
Maybe so. It's not all that uncommon for heroes to go above and beyond their own strength, somehow.
Originally posted by abhilegendHow does this particular scan make him 3-4 times stronger?
Wraith was 3-4 times stronger than Superman too if you see the way he absorbed sunlight and the amount of time he did absorb that.Funny, eh? I'd bet being stronger than Superman by that margin would place Wraith above Kurse too.
mmm
Superman holds back so he will only use 50 gwatts max and store the rest for greater feats such as ripping DD in half.
😛
But seriously
140 gwatts *sec is lifting 140 billion Newtons a height of a meter (Or over 15 million tons). In 2 seconds this is doubled, 3 seconds tripled, etc. So theoretically Wraith could be 100s of times stronger.
Originally posted by abhilegend
He absorbed more power than Superman. Superman was doing it for 25 years. Wraith was doing it for 75 years.Simple observation.
That....ignores the aging process, and the fact that both sides would be expending energy.
If both had just sat there, absorbing energy for 25/75 years respectively, then fine. But they didn't.
Originally posted by DarkSaint85dammit man! What did we say about using logic and reason in the Vs forum? Do we need to temp ban you again?
That....ignores the aging process, and the fact that both sides would be expending energy.If both had just sat there, absorbing energy for 25/75 years respectively, then fine. But they didn't.
Originally posted by DarkSaint85
That....ignores the aging process, and the fact that both sides would be expending energy.If both had just sat there, absorbing energy for 25/75 years respectively, then fine. But they didn't.
So 3-4 times stronger seems right.