Originally posted by Flyattractor
[b]Closest to "DISSAPOINTMENT" for me was the last Bats movie. They should have held it back till the next summer, and ironed out some of the plot problems. They probably *Being the WB* rushed it out that year to challenge the Avengers. [/B]
i didn;t mind the plotholes especially since they were easy to explain, but yeah definitely they prolly could have
Meh, I don't get all the hate for Interstellar. I agree entirely that it took too much time building the plot out in the cornfields. Give some flavor about what life is like, but I was about to check my watch to figure out if they were going to have enough time to get to the good stuff. That said, the science of it was relatively sound--even vetted by experts in the field as such--the post-Children of the Corn events were compelling, the twist with Damon's character I don't think most people saw coming, and the 'what-if' of Hathaway's commentary on love being something viable as a sense coming back around in terms of her original suggestion of where they should go sat well with me. The planet side scenes as well as almost all the moments in space, whether just at rest or in the middle of a life-and-death scenario were well presented.
There was a point within the tesseract that literally everyone in the theater was sitting, waiting for it all to come back together, and I think that resolution was had for most. Lastly, it did the one thing for me that Prometheus did: it made me want to effing go into space. Loved it; it wasn't perfect, but I loved it, and it was worth every dollar for the movie ticket.
It's kind of funny, though. I notice that the longer some posters are on this board, the more they tend to lambaste anything that isn't to their particular standards, nitpicking it to death in every way possible, while at the same time defending the titles that they do enjoy to no end, dancing around in rose-colored glasses and borderline refusing to see any shortcomings in their films of choice.
Originally posted by Ascendancy
Meh, I don't get all the hate for Interstellar. I agree entirely that it took too much time building the plot out in the cornfields. Give some flavor about what life is like, but I was about to check my watch to figure out if they were going to have enough time to get to the good stuff. That said, the science of it was relatively sound--even vetted by experts in the field as such--the post-Children of the Corn events were compelling, the twist with Damon's character I don't think most people saw coming, and the 'what-if' of Hathaway's commentary on love being something viable as a sense coming back around in terms of her original suggestion of where they should go sat well with me. The planet side scenes as well as almost all the moments in space, whether just at rest or in the middle of a life-and-death scenario were well presented.There was a point within the tesseract that literally everyone in the theater was sitting, waiting for it all to come back together, and I think that resolution was had for most. Lastly, it did the one thing for me that Prometheus did: it made me want to effing go into space. Loved it; it wasn't perfect, but I loved it, and it was worth every dollar for the movie ticket.
It's kind of funny, though. I notice that the longer some posters are on this board, the more they tend to lambaste anything that isn't to their particular standards, nitpicking it to death in every way possible, while at the same time defending the titles that they do enjoy to no end, dancing around in rose-colored glasses and borderline refusing to see any shortcomings in their films of choice.
👆 👆
Christopher Nolan Said To Be Involved With AKIRA Trilogy At WB - His 2017 Movie Perhaps?
Originally posted by Inhuman
Christopher Nolan Said To Be Involved With AKIRA Trilogy At WB - His 2017 Movie Perhaps?
if true than Akira just got a whole lot better
Nolan's next movie confirmed. Tom Hardy in talks to join.
http://www.thewrap.com/tom-hardy-in-talks-to-star-in-christopher-nolans-wwii-movie-dunkirk/