XSUPREMEXSKILLZ
The Immortal Emperor
Originally posted by FreshestSlice
Scourge isn't contending with Obi-Wan and Anakin at once. Experience isn't going to be a win-all for anyone here, and rarely actually translates into anything.
Neither Savage nor Ventress is even beating Anakin or Kenobi alone on a consistent basis, (neither is Scourge, just that Ventress has the same trouble with one of them as both, kind of an inconsistency.) And I'm pretty sure experience translates for someone like Scourge, considering the mountains of "too powerful" jedi and sith he's killed. At the very least it's been said he can quickly and easily point out an opponent's weaknesses/quirks due to his experience/lifespan.
Originally posted by FreshestSlice
There's really no way to lie to people with magical powers. If the HoT is winning a duel, he should easily be able to sense this. Scourge says he could have killed you on Quesh, sure. Doesn't really compare to the actual duel we see him in where he is at a disadvantage. Scourge's words don't suggest he wasn't going all out while Vitiate was watching at all, anyway.
> Argues there's no way to lie to people with magical powers.
> Reads the Revan Novel, wherein Scourge lies to Vitiate's face and keeps his intentions hidden from Vitiate for 300 years.
>kek.
And the Hero agrees that Scourge could-have-but-didn't kill him on Quesh, otherwise he wouldn't have let Scourge join him in the first place for lying. All we know that's specifically stated and implied is that:
>Scourge and The Hero were stalemating.
>Scourge decided to, "break off the fight for some reason." Could the kneeling be him, "breaking off?" Perhaps. At the very least, we know that Scourge wasn't trying to kill The Hero.
>Afterwards, Scourge explains that he can be trusted, citing that he could have killed the Hero on Quesh, and yet didn't. The Hero then uses this to deduce that Scourge is trustworthy. The Hero would have concluded otherwise if he knew the statement was indeed inaccurate.
Originally posted by FreshestSlice
Misread. The point is the same, though. Saying Scourge is comparable to Act II HoT, so he should be able to content with Savage is wrong, imo. The HoT doesn't even get into the big leagues until their story ends, and really a little after. Scourge has absolutely zero growth in power once he joins the crew, and displays none of it, admitting obvious inferiority by the end, him not even being able to resist Vitiate.
The Hero of Tython's significant increase in skill and power from Act 2 and Scourge's lack of significant increase are both irrelevant in this case, since my argument revolves around Scourge's performance of act 2 Hero, who is still very, very powerful. This is the dude who killed Angral, then proceeded to defeat a Child of the Emperor directly possessed by Vitiate, (Even 'Thor had evident trouble with these late-game.) This is still the most powerful and skilled jedi in the order, moreso than the Barsen'thor, who can defeat an ancient sith lord siphoning energies from hundreds of jedi whilst weakened from repeated uses of the shielding technique. The Hero's still damn good, imho parity with him at that point is at the very least parity with Savage.
Originally posted by FreshestSlice
Why would he be dead? The Wrath isn't just going to watch while Ekkage kills him. He's be pressing the attack the entire time. Fact is, Timmns is vastly inferior to everyone see on Belsavis, and his help is inconsequential.
The Wrath wouldn't have to, "just watch." We already know that Ekkage can flicka da wrist an average jedi knight/sith lord, Timmns theoretically would have been dead if he was inconsequential. And assuming Ekkage even was occupied with the Wrath the entire time to the point where she couldn't flicka da wrist, that certainly gives Timmns ample opportunity to aid.
Originally posted by FreshestSlice
Wrath defeating the one of the greatest masters and his best student, alone I might add, almost three years before his prime, is a little out of Baras' league at any point before TOR proper. Karr didn't stalemate Baras. He almost killed him, iirc. Finally, Baras didn't give Sel-Makor the Emperor for an amp, although he did receive one. He game it the Emperor to get him out of the way so no one would question him being the Voice, you know, like the actual Voice. And while it may be significant, Wrath is defeating Makor, while it's possessing the actual voice, in the heart of the Nightmare Lands, as well as legions of its pawns. It's obviously not a win-all either.
1. The Wrath hasn't reached his prime yet.
2. You're right, it's nearly killed. That said, it's just as circumstantial as Kaedan capturing the Dread Masters, i.e. we don't know them. And no, Baras specifically made a deal of power with Sel-Makor, it wasn't a give-you-the-Emperor-for-free card, and Sel-Makor just amped him out of the kindness of his heart. And sure it's not a win-all, but taking Wrath's Makor feat as it is, I'd doubt Maul stacks up either.