CNN GOP Debate

Originally posted by Time-Immemorial
How is this any different then the people that will vote for anything far left?

I mean can you try to at least drop your bullshit? Its getting effing pathetic.

His redirect did more for him then some manliness question and answer about the debt. Anyone with half a brain knows the debt will never go down based on how stupid everyone is in the government.

It will play well going against the media, cause people are tired of the the media, or are you not aware of this.

Its so sad to see blinders on all the liberal posters here. To realize they government actually doesn't care about you and would rather bring in non citizens and give them equal rights and voting and water down your freedoms and liberties along with it would break your soft hearts.

👆

Originally posted by Time-Immemorial
The debate moderators are not supposed to be politically bias and motivated. Its called professional journalism, I know that is hard to understand in this day in age with bias journalism. The CNBC was actually not tough at all, the GOP slaughtered them. It was quiet hilarious. Literally the candidates were laughing in their faces.

If the questions were not tough at all, then why should the alleged bias of the people asking them matter?

If that was the case, the candidates should have been able to gently bat the questions away and look like statesmen while they were at it, instead of having a meltdown onstage about how the questions are unfair and the moderators are not being nice.

Originally posted by Robtard
Exactly; that's what they can't understand, the deflection tactics with blaming the media, Obama, Hillary or any other imagined bogyman when a candidate can't answer a question only caters to that specific group; the group that's already decided.

Just like you blamed Benghazi on the republicans, goof👆

Originally posted by Adam_PoE
If the questions were not tough at all, then why should the alleged bias of the people asking them matter?

If that was the case, the candidates should have been able to gently bat the questions away and look like statesmen while they were at it, instead of having a meltdown onstage about how the questions are unfair and the moderators are not being nice.

So a question cannot be stupid but soft? Its their own fault they got slaughtered.

Originally posted by Time-Immemorial
How is this any different then the people that will vote for anything far left?

I mean can you try to at least drop your bullshit? Its getting effing pathetic.

His redirect did more for him then some manliness question and answer about the debt. Anyone with half a brain knows the debt will never go down based on how stupid everyone is in the government.

It will play well going against the media, cause people are tired of the the media, or are you not aware of this.

Its so sad to see blinders on all the liberal posters here. To realize they government actually doesn't care about you and would rather bring in non citizens and give them equal rights and voting and water down your freedoms and liberties along with it would break your soft hearts.

I think this answers your question:

Originally posted by Robtard
Exactly; that's what they can't understand, the deflection tactics with blaming the media, Obama, Hillary or any other imagined bogyman when a candidate can't answer a question only caters to that specific group; the group that's already decided.

Originally posted by Star428
👆

They haven't figured out that the sell out liberals are just there for the votes and the power and prestige. They are not there to actually help citizens.

Originally posted by Adam_PoE
I think this answers your question:

Yes it does, Just like you blamed the republicans for benghazi.:lol

And that was not a rebuttal. If you can't confront it, keep hiding.

Originally posted by Time-Immemorial
So a question cannot be stupid but soft? Its their own fault they got slaughtered.

If a question is stupid, it should be easy to answer it earnestly.

If instead of answering the question, one challenges the validity of the question and attacks the motivation of the person asking the question, then perhaps the question is not so stupid after all.

Originally posted by Adam_PoE
If a question is stupid, it should be easy to answer it earnestly.

If instead of answering the question, one challenges the validity of the question and attacks the motivation of the person asking the question, then perhaps the question is not so stupid after all.

So the fantasy football questions, and comic characters are stupid questions, guess what, they ended up eating it. I mean its like you cant understand that CNBC was completely embarrassed and the GOP numbers got stronger, and all you and Robbie are doing is crying about Ted Cruz.😂

TIL: If a question is too easy to answer, the best approach is to deflect away, rant/whine and not answer it

Originally posted by Time-Immemorial
Yes it does, Just like you blamed the republicans for benghazi.:lol

And that was not a rebuttal. If you can't confront it, keep hiding.

It is a complete rebuttal. The thing you do not seem to understand is that you are not representative of the rest of the electorate. Just because his antics are a hit with you and far-right primary voters, does not mean that they will play well with the general electorate, and that is whom decides elections.

Originally posted by Robtard
TIL: If a question is too easy to answer, the best approach is to deflect away, rant/whine and not answer it

Cry more about it.

Whhahahhaaahah Ted Cruz ****ed up CNBC, whaaaaaaaaa

Originally posted by Adam_PoE
It is a complete rebuttal. The thing you do not seem to understand is that you are not representative of the rest of the electorate. Just because his antics are a hit with you and far-right primary voters, does not mean that they will play well with the general electorate, and that is whom decides elections.

That is where you are wrong, if you think people will vote for Hilary because they are not all far right wing, you are gravely mistaken.

Originally posted by Time-Immemorial
Cry more about it.

Whhahahhaaahah Ted Cruz ****ed up CNBC, whaaaaaaaaa

😂

Originally posted by Time-Immemorial
Cry more about it.

Whhahahhaaahah Ted Cruz ****ed up CNBC, whaaaaaaaaa

Wow, seems the cheerleading squad was called in. Carry on.

Originally posted by Time-Immemorial
So the fantasy football questions, and comic characters are stupid questions, guess what, they ended up eating it. I mean its like you cant understand that CNBC was completely embarrassed and the GOP numbers got stronger, and all you and Robbie are doing is crying about Ted Cruz.😂

"Mr. Trump, you've done very well in this campaign so far by promising to build a wall and make another country pay for it, send 11 million people out of the country, cut taxes $10 trillion without increasing the deficit, and make Americans better off because your greatness would replace the stupidity and incompetence of others. Let's be honest, is this a comic-book version of a presidential campaign?"

Do you think if he wins the Republican nomination that the Democratic nominee will not challenge him similarly, especially when another member of his own party on the same debate stage did so:

"To talk about having a 10 percent tithe, that's how we're going to fund the government? . . . We're just gonna be 'great,' or we're just going to ship 10 million Americans, or people, out of the country, leaving their children here and dividing families? Folks, we have to wake up. . . . We can't elect somebody who doesn't know how to do the job. Why don't we just give a chicken in every pot while coming up with these fantasies?"

Originally posted by Time-Immemorial
That is where you are wrong, if you think people will vote for Hilary because they are not all far right wing, you are gravely mistaken.

Do you not read polls? Currently, there is no Republican candidate the touches Clinton.

Originally posted by Adam_PoE
"Mr. Trump, you've done very well in this campaign so far by promising to build a wall and make another country pay for it, send 11 million people out of the country, cut taxes $10 trillion without increasing the deficit, and make Americans better off because your greatness would replace the stupidity and incompetence of others. Let's be honest, is this a comic-book version of a presidential campaign?"

Do you think if he wins the Republican nomination that the Democratic nominee will not challenge him similarly, especially when another member of his own party on the same debate stage did so:

"To talk about having a 10 percent tithe, that's how we're going to fund the government? . . . We're just gonna be 'great,' or we're just going to ship 10 million Americans, or people, out of the country, leaving their children here and dividing families? Folks, we have to wake up. . . . We can't elect somebody who doesn't know how to do the job. Why don't we just give a chicken in every pot while coming up with these fantasies?"

Why I hoped Kasich would win the nom, he's the most sensible and realistic out of the eleven. But he's basically done at this point.

Originally posted by Adam_PoE
Do you not read polls? Currently, there is no Republican candidate the touches Clinton.

Um do you? There are like 15 republicans and 2 liberals.

It's like you don't understand what's going to happen when they all drop out but and trump/Carson/rubio are left.