Originally posted by StyleTime
Even going by that logic, there are white gang members too. You'd have to provide some kind of source with actual numbers before you can make a claim like that.You're essentially saying "I feel like this is true, so it must be true."
There are a few, almost all are in prison and or very few members. A few thousand. Mostly to stay safe from the other gangs. Compared to the millions of those in black and mexican gangs. You've got thousands of hitmen who've killed dozens of people each. They are serial killers.
Again, you're providing numbers and statements with no backing. Your hunch is a hunch. We're willing to listen to you if you'd support it somehow.
Maybe I'm falling prey to your troll attempt. Holy shit, you've been training with Mindset. I ****ing knew it!
He's wily. Maybe this is all part of his plan. mhmm
Originally posted by Bashar Teg
for someone who obviously doesn't know the definition of 'serial killer', longpig seems to know a lot about serial killers. i would trust his figures. it's not like someone would just go on the internet and lie about stuff to win an argument.
Preposterous, good sir! What sort of cad would do such a thing?
Originally posted by Bashar Teg
for someone who obviously doesn't know the definition of 'serial killer', longpig seems to know a lot about serial killers. i would trust his figures. it's not like someone would just go on the internet and lie about stuff to win an argument.
You've been brainwashed by the media where you actually think white men are the violent ones. A certain minority is 12% of America, but commits 40+% of violent crime.
Originally posted by Bashar Teg
Ah good thanks for confirming. You do not know what a serial killer is.
Killing 3 or more is the definition used by nearly every country on earth to describe a serial killer.
The media tells us serial killers are usually a white man, but the truth is most serial killers are young black males. Whites by percentage commit way, way, way less violent crime compared to minorities.
Originally posted by Ushgarakwhat about the examples of black on white murders that are clearly just as racially motivated as the SC shooting and yet don't attract the same media shitstorm?
Ok, fair enough then.The wider point, then, is that racially motivated killings are something that currently gets a LOT of attention (we only have to look in the GDF to see how riled up people are getting over racial issues right now in the US- indeed, that is the basis of this thread), so of course when a white guy blows away blacks for stated racial reasons, that is going to get major coverage. Same if a black person killed whites for similar reasons.
It's not some sort of anti-white media agenda, it's purely about what people want to engage in. Just another pissed off guy trying to murder his family with a gun doesn't make the cut any more.
http://downtrend.com/71superb/black-teens-beat-white-man-to-death-with-hammers-in-st-louis
Originally posted by red g jacks
what about the examples of black on white murders that are clearly just as racially motivated as the SC shooting and yet don't attract the same media shitstorm?http://downtrend.com/71superb/black-teens-beat-white-man-to-death-with-hammers-in-st-louis
Originally posted by long pigThis is actually true, though it's apparently a fairly recent phenomenon.
Most serial killers are black
Over half of all US serial killers in the past two decades have been black.
Originally posted by red g jacks
what about the examples of black on white murders that are clearly just as racially motivated as the SC shooting and yet don't attract the same media shitstorm?http://downtrend.com/71superb/black-teens-beat-white-man-to-death-with-hammers-in-st-louis
You say 'clearly' but that is in fact only an opinion. There's no hook here for the media (except for the slight secondary buzz of the conservative perspective trying to say it was being silenced)- no clearly stated racial motive, not part of a big trend, no guns involved, victim was an immigrant with a clearly foreign name.
So again, nothing to do with race, really- just not very interesting to the media. People die like that every day.
Originally posted by Ushgaraklol
You say 'clearly' but that is in fact only an opinion. There's no hook here for the media (except for the slight secondary buzz of the conservative perspective trying to say it was being silenced)- no clearly stated racial motive, not part of a big trend, no guns involved, victim was an immigrant with a clearly foreign name.So again, nothing to do with race, really- just not very interesting to the media. People die like that every day.
i said clearly because it's as obvious as daylight
http://www.infowars.com/blacks-screamed-kill-the-white-people-before-brutal-murder-of-zemir-begic/
it's way more obvious that this was racially motivated than let's say the trayvon martin shooting, which got a lot more attention
the fact that he had a foreign name and that there were no guns involved has absolutely nothing to do with anything at all, btw. i also love how the police say "we have no evidence this was because he was bosnian" as if racist thugs in st louis are really going to make that distinction. white is white as far as the hood is concerned.
No, it's just an opinion, and that video is just of a guy talking (and he hardly sounds objective). Police deny it was racial; you can disbelieve that if you want but it had no media traction. There was also no massive case of injustice here, seeing as the police arrested the perpetrators.
This is completely different to Trayvon Martin where, again, regardless of what you think about that not being clearly racial, it was immediately wrapped into the public conciousness as part of the racial debate, and hence was of interest to the media.
The foreign name and lack of guns has a LOT to do with it. Media is more interested in dead people with American sounding names and gun deaths are more likely to pick up public consciousness (though as I noted earlier, it takes more than that these days in the US). These are reasons the media did not pick it up, not your anti-white conspiracy claims.
Originally posted by Ushgarakit's an opinion, fine. i'd say it's the more reasonable opinion. i disbelieve the police because the police almost never say a black on white attack is racial and they have no other motive that they want to propose as an alternative to the racial motive. just "move on folks there's nothing to see here." and keep in mind this all happened in the contexts of a city that was buzzing with racially charged energy after a high profile racially charged case of a cop shooting a black guy, that of course the media picked up on immediately despite there being no evidence at all that the shooting was either unjust or racially motivated.
No, it's just an opinion, and that video is just of a guy talking (and he hardly sounds objective). Police deny it was racial; you can disbelieve that if you want but it had no media traction. There was also no massive case of injustice here, seeing as the police arrested the perpetrators.
This is completely different to Trayvon Martin where, again, regardless of what you think about that not being clearly racial, it was immediately wrapped into the public conciousness as part of the racial debate, and hence was of interest to the media.what does this even mean? it was wrapped in the public consciousness as part of the racial debate because that's the angle the media chose to run with. zimmerman, despite being hispanic, was portrayed as a white man. and trayvon, despite being 17 years old with the physique of a grown man, was portrayed as a child.
The foreign name and lack of guns has a LOT to do with it. Media is more interested in dead people with American sounding names and gun deaths are more likely to pick up public consciousness (though as I noted earlier, it takes more than that these days in the US). These are reasons the media did not pick it up, not your anti-white conspiracy claims.then the media is stupid. because racists in the hood don't give a shit if your name sounds american or not. and the fact that the murder was a brutal beating with hammers rather than a shooting once again has nothing to do with whether or not it was racially motivated. in the LA riots after the rodney king case whites were similarly dragged out of their cars and beaten by black rioters.
i'd note that this claim that the media only cares about american sounding names and gun deaths is like, just your opinion, man. and it's not a particularly smart or well informed opinion, as far as i'm concerned. also, i'm willing to wager you've never stepped foot inside an american hood in your entire life.