House Preparing to Toss Boehner

Started by Omega Vision4 pages

Originally posted by psmith81992
I think it's the former because Boehner is dicking up the image of conservatives in this country. He's making conservatives seem like the "party of no", when its' really him.

I'm with Bardock here, I don't imagine Boehner's replacement is going to be a more conciliatory figure. It's quite likely they'll be the opposite.

ITS ABOUT TIME!!!!!!

**** THAT GUY!

I started this movement and it went to the TOP^

Well he didn't get KICKED OUT! He did what Omeggy and barddy would have wanted. He COMPROMISED!

Or he QUIT!!!!!!!!!! I wonder if he cried?

Apparently your fellow conservative psmith would also prefer more compromise

Originally posted by Bardock42
Apparently your fellow conservative psmith would also prefer more compromise

Oh wait I forgot, the republicans have to compromise and pass bills that Obama just veto's, but Obama does not have to compromise, he just rams executive action down the countries throat. You are a shameful person bardock, and a liar.

Originally posted by Time-Immemorial
Oh wait I forgot, the republicans have to compromise and pass bills that Obama just veto's, but Obama does not have to compromise, he just rams executive action down the countries throat. You are a shameful person bardock, and a liar.

I think the personal attacks are unnecessary.

You shouldn't call someone a liar for disagreeing with you.

Originally posted by Time-Immemorial
Oh wait I forgot, the republicans have to compromise and pass bills that Obama just veto's, but Obama does not have to compromise, he just rams executive action down the countries throat. You are a shameful person bardock, and a liar.

What did I lie about allegedly?

You ignore Obama's uncompromising position and ram rodding executive action down our throats, but then think the republicans have to compromise. If liar is the wrong term I apologize, its being disingenuous.

Originally posted by Bardock42
You think he will be replaced with someone more willing to compromise? After all the recent attack came from a wing that wants to say even more "no"
I firmly believe conservative leaders are starting to understand their faults and will replace him with someone better and more open to compromise.

I cant believe we had to put up with Obama's puppet for 5 years.

Of course he cried. He cried orange tears.

**** BONER!

So let me get this clear, when Boehner was threatening to collapse the country's economy, your complain is he didn't go far enough?

Not sure what sort of Speaker TI wants. Presumably one who will kick Obama in the nuts as soon as he's sworn in.

Or one willing to collapse the economy to prevent experimental universal healthcare.

Originally posted by Lestov16
Or one willing to collapse the economy to prevent experimental universal healthcare.

Your posts are as hilariously idiotic as TI.

Not sure what sort of Speaker TI wants. Presumably one who will kick Obama in the nuts as soon as he's sworn in.

I would be on board with that. Do you have any idea how man youtube hits a video like that would generate?

Originally posted by Lestov16
Or one willing to collapse the economy to prevent experimental universal healthcare.

Shutting the government down will not collapse the economy, you been smoking to much now if you really believe that.

Originally posted by Omega Vision
Not sure what sort of Speaker TI wants. Presumably one who will kick Obama in the nuts as soon as he's sworn in.

Boner was a shill, and a played bend over for Obama to many times. He ran on defunding Obama care, and he ended up funding it.

That's an insane way of looking at things. He funded it because the alternative was to be the guy who goes down in history as the man who destroyed the credibility of the US government. It was a game of chicken, one the Republicans thought they could win.

He was weak and a shill and a drunk and bent over on everything he said he was going to do.

Did you even do that Obama care calculator and see what your premiums and deductibles are going to be?