Originally posted by Surtur
At this point Putin is pretty much more or less just a gangster. Only again Russia is beginning to think they can do whatever the f*ck they want. It's time we nip that little notion in the butt.
Obama would never challenge Putin, the only person in the white house with balls is Michelle. She would have made a better president then her side show husband. Obama doesn't have the balls to challenge Putin, just empty rhetoric and speeches and his press secretary barely able to get through his white house briefings to the media. He can barely make sense of what Obama is doing, much less anyone else. Obama's bend over politics have rushed us into a nuclear arms race in the middle east and a new cold war that will heat up quickly.
Rubio predicted this all at the last debate, of coarse no one listened.
Originally posted by Bardock42
Show where in the article you posted it says they were bombing anti-Assad revels, liar.
Suck it, you read the article and then lied about it, liar.
"But U.S. Defense Secretary Ash Carter countered that claim.
"I want to be careful about confirming information, but it does appear that they (Russian airstrikes) were in areas where there probably were not ISIL forces," he told reporters. ISIL is an acronym for ISIS."
Then there is this.
Liar.
Originally posted by Time-Immemorial
Suck it, you read the article and then lied about it, liar."But U.S. Defense Secretary Ash Carter countered that claim.
"I want to be careful about confirming information, but it does appear that they (Russian airstrikes) were in areas where there probably were not ISIL forces," he told reporters. ISIL is an acronym for ISIS."
Liar.
This does not say they targeted anti-Assad forces. That's your presumption. This just says they probably didn't target ISIS forces. So, yes, you are lying again to fit your preconceived notions.
Originally posted by Bardock42
This does not say they targeted anti-Assad forces. That's your presumption. This just says they probably didn't target ISIS forces. So, yes, you are lying again to fit your preconceived notions.
Clearly you can't read, liar.
Putin already admitted he is propping up assad against the the rebels on 60 minutes.
Another one of your failures as a loser on the internet.
Originally posted by Time-Immemorial
Clearly you can't read, liar.Putin already admitted he is propping up assad against the the rebels on 60 minutes.
Another one of your failures as a loser on the internet.
You were the one claiming that your CNN article stated that Russian airstrikes targeted anti-Assad forces, which it did not. The Al-Jazeera article you have now posted on the other hand does make that claim.
You just have to learn how proving a point works.
Originally posted by Time-Immemorial
Clearly you have no deduction skills nor can you come to a reasonable conclusion without reading in on the internet. Hence why you are here. To troll the internet and save your dwindling ideology of the world outside Germany.
Or you just take things to say what you want them to say. When in fact the very article you posted talked about how there was uncertainty and, for example, French officials wanted to learn more.
To be fair, I am being nit-picky, I just found your disingenuous reply to Bentley obnoxious.
Originally posted by Bardock42
Or you just take things to say what you want them to say. When in fact the very article you posted talked about how there was uncertainty and, for example, French officials wanted to learn more.To be fair, I am being nit-picky, I just found your disingenuous reply to Bentley obnoxious.
I actually watch the news in America, where is you have what... BBC?
Originally posted by Time-Immemorial
Thats all Bardock does. He nitpicks and then screams "liar" cause his "racist, biggot" ones ran out of meaning, just right out of Alinski's playbook.
Don't worry, I'll call you a racist again when you are being racist, which will happen sooner or later.
But lets put this aside because it is being silly.
What would you like to be the US response to Syria? What do you think should happen?
Originally posted by Time-Immemorial
I actually watch the news in America, where is you have what... BBC?
I have American news sources as well, however, it is pretty silly to talk in that way about the BBC (which I don't generally watch or read, I prefer the guardian for my British news), which is a very big and well regarded news outlet.