World War 3

Started by Lestov165 pages

Wait, so the logic here is that to avoid a WWIII with Russia, China, and Iran, we should directly attack Iran instead of negotiate, thus provoking Russia and China and thus starting WWIII.....

Um....

Copy paste for that link isnt working.

https://www.google.com/search?q=chinese+carrier+in+suez&oq=chinese+carrier+in+suez&aqs=chrome..69i57.8042j0j4&sourceid=chrome&es_sm=91&ie=UTF-8

Originally posted by Time-Immemorial
Lol Decades. You really are slow. They can pump those out faster then you think.

It took the Ronald Reagan 3 years. Which is one of the largest ever built.

Decades.😂

Obama is afraid to use the military. The rest of the world sees his weakness and is pouncing on it and embarrassing him, shaking his hand and slapping him in the face.

You live in a simplistic world where military strength and action is the only valid international relationship, and are therefore blind to the Obama administrations strength in diplomacy. You would prefer a guns-blazing approach to it, that frankly created the whole mess we currently have in the Middle East under Bush.

Originally posted by Bardock42
You live in a simplistic world where military strength and action is the only valid international relationship, and are therefore blind to the Obama administrations strength in diplomacy. You would prefer a guns-blazing approach to it, that frankly created the whole mess we currently have in the Middle East under Bush.

Tell me what Obama's diplomacy has done in Syria and the middle east? Besides alienate our allies, and band our enemies together who are about to take over.

Obama failed

http://www.nationalreview.com/article/424873/syria-russia-iran-united-states-enemies-obama

Originally posted by Lestov16
Wait, so the logic here is that to avoid a WWIII with Russia, China, and Iran, we should directly attack Iran instead of negotiate, thus provoking Russia and China and thus starting WWIII.....

Um....

Or we could just not do the nuke deal. Interesting how that works for a small brain child like yourself.

Originally posted by Time-Immemorial
It took the Ronald Reagan 3 years. Which is one of the largest ever built.
1. The United States is also the richest and most technologically advanced country in the world, with logistical capabilities that's decades ahead of China's.

2. Even if China could build one carrier per three years, that's still a minimum of 27 years to reach America's current fleet of 10. That's almost three decades. How ****ing bad at math are you?

3. Even with carriers, US military aircraft outnumbers the Chinese airforce 7 to 1.

Do you do even a little research and critical thinking before you make retarded claims, or do you just spout this shit instinctively?

Syria is a tricky situation and the US, like Russia as well now, has decided to use airstrikes to try to work it out. Admittedly the idea to help strengthen the rebels seems to have been a failure, so now there's a real issue of who to back and what to do that is in the best interest of the United States.

In the Middle East generally though he was able to bring different actors together to broker a deal with Iran that would be beneficial for all parties involved, ultimately perhaps laying the ground work to bring Iran back into the International Community in a more friendly way (it's sort of the Vietnam thing, military intervention completely failed, the US economy and culture on the other hand has made it a safe, prime destination for tourists now...)

Originally posted by Time-Immemorial
Tell me what Obama's diplomacy has done in Syria and the middle east? Besides alienate our allies, and band our enemies together who are about to take over.

Obama failed

http://www.nationalreview.com/article/424873/syria-russia-iran-united-states-enemies-obama

Actually, I"d say Obama hasn't failed. He's done a damn fine job of weakening America and our allies. Which is exactly what he really wanted to do while claiming he's a "Christian" but clearly favoring the murdering Islamic religion over Christianity. LMAO.

I'll be so damn glad when he's finally gone and we get a strong republican in office who actually loves and respects our republic. Which we most certainly will get during next election. I"m tired of looking at that American and Christian-hating ****er .

Originally posted by Star428
Actually, I"d say Obama hasn't failed. He's done a damn fine job of weakening America and our allies. Which is exactly what he really wanted to do while claiming he's a "Christian" but clearly favoring the murdering Islamic religion over Christianity. LMAO.

I'll be so damn glad when he's finally gone and we get a strong republican in office who actually loves and respects our republic. I"m tired of looking at that American and Christian-hating ****er .

What will you do if, god forbid, Hillary becomes president?

Originally posted by Tzeentch
Do you do even a little research and critical thinking before you make retarded claims, or do you just spout this shit instinctively?

Do you even have to ask this?

Originally posted by Tzeentch
1. The United States is also the richest and most technologically advanced country in the world, with logistical capabilities that's decades ahead of China's.

2. Even if China could build one carrier per three years, that's still a minimum of 27 years to reach America's current fleet of 10. That's almost three decades. How ****ing bad at math are you?

3. Even with carriers, US military aircraft outnumbers the Chinese airforce 7 to 1.

Do you do even a little research and critical thinking before you make retarded claims, or do you just spout this shit instinctively?

1. So? Are you suggesting the rest of the world has no power?

2. You think they can only build one carrier per three years😂 Guess you don't remember how many we built after pearl harbor after we lost all of them. So better at math then your cherrypicking ass.

3. I don't recall just talking about China. And your clueless again.

Originally posted by Time-Immemorial
Or we could just not do the nuke deal. Interesting how that works for a small brain child like yourself.

👆

Originally posted by Bardock42
Syria is a tricky situation and the US, like Russia as well now, has decided to use airstrikes to try to work it out. Admittedly the idea to help strengthen the rebels seems to have been a failure, so now there's a real issue of who to back and what to do that is in the best interest of the United States.

In the Middle East generally though he was able to bring different actors together to broker a deal with Iran that would be beneficial for all parties involved, ultimately perhaps laying the ground work to bring Iran back into the International Community in a more friendly way (it's sort of the Vietnam thing, military intervention completely failed, the US economy and culture on the other hand has made it a safe, prime destination for tourists now...)

So you agree Obama failed in Syria, nice downplaying with the "tricky part."

Originally posted by Tzeentch
1. The United States is also the richest and most technologically advanced country in the world, with logistical capabilities that's decades ahead of China's.

2. Even if China could build one carrier per three years, that's still a minimum of 27 years to reach America's current fleet of 10. That's almost three decades. How ****ing bad at math are you?

3. Even with carriers, US military aircraft outnumbers the Chinese airforce 7 to 1.

Do you do even a little research and critical thinking before you make retarded claims, or do you just spout this shit instinctively?


Originally posted by Tzeentch
Why do people unironically try to have discussions with Supra?

Originally posted by Bardock42
What will you do if, god forbid, Hillary becomes president?

Thats like me asking you, "What will you do when you get diagnosed with coronary arterial blockage?"

Originally posted by Time-Immemorial
So you agree Obama failed in Syria, nice downplaying with the "tricky part."

Failed in what way? I suppose the same way that Putin failed.

Originally posted by Time-Immemorial
Thats like me asking you, "What will you do when you get diagnosed with coronary arterial blockage?"

So you think Hillary will become president then?

That or you don't get how comparisons work.

Originally posted by Bardock42
Failed in what way? I suppose the same way that Putin failed.

Putin failed in Syria?😂

News to me, got a link?

Originally posted by Time-Immemorial
Thats like me asking you, "What will you do when you get diagnosed with coronary arterial blockage?"

EXactly. LOL. Or asking, what will you do when Hell freezes over? 😆

Originally posted by Star428
EXactly. LOL. Or asking, what will youdo when Hell freezes over? 😆

My question to bardock was more based current events.