Should their be new 'Darths' in new canon

Started by FreshestSlice2 pages
FreshestSlice Eternal Commander

Originally posted by ares834
You do realize the entire EU is unneeded fluff. RIght?

You're implying I approve of most of the EU. I don't. However, comparing an entire story to a useless change in background info, and not particularly straining background info at that, is a stupid as renaming Korriban Moraband.

Except it is similar in that it's a name members of the order take as their own.

And how would that be any different if the pre-Banite Sith did the same, the cruch of your thinking is the title Darth should be something only Banite Sith use, because Bane just pulled that title out of nowhere?

The Merchant Senior Member

We don't even need Sith tbh, most people just saw Vader as a Fallen Jedi Knight.

ares834 Senior Member
Originally posted by FreshestSlice
And how would that be any different if the pre-Banite Sith did the same, the cruch of your thinking is the title Darth should be something only Banite Sith use, because Bane just pulled that title out of nowhere?

No. I think it should be his actual name.