Iran Test Fires New Long Range Missles

Started by Time-Immemorial3 pages

Originally posted by Robtard
Yes, clearly with your immediate comment to OV about "ignorance" when confronted about Iran's conventional military having nothing to do with the nuclear deal and then the supposed "downplaying" of these missiles.

So then, what's your issue with Iran having missiles?

Why do they need long range precision missiles capable or hitting Israel?

Originally posted by Time-Immemorial
Why do they need long range precision missiles capable or hitting Israel?

You may dislike them, you may think of their influence as negative (and I would agree), but Iran has the same right to a conventional military deterrent as Israel does.

Announced: This violates current UN resolutions.
Just heard it on CNN.

Originally posted by Time-Immemorial
Why do they need long range precision missiles capable or hitting Israel?

Considering they're enemies with Israel and Israel threatens to bomb them every other day (yes, slight exaggeration), it's called a deterrent. "Don't **** with us or else", same reason why Israel has nukes, as a [mega] deterrent to her enemies that surround her.

edit: OV answered already

And your opinion of it violating current UN resolutions?

If they did violate UN resolutions with these missiles (which I'm confused, as Iran's had missiles), then they'll have to suffer the fallout of such actions.

Originally posted by Time-Immemorial
And your opinion of it violating current UN resolutions?

That's more serious then, and if they did, the UN should take the appropriate measures.

Originally posted by Robtard
If they did violate UN resolutions with these missiles (which I'm confused, as Iran's had missiles), then they'll have to suffer the fallout of such actions.

The fallout😂

So thats the end of the it then.

Originally posted by Time-Immemorial
The fallout😂

So thats the end of the it then.


What reaction do you want? Bomb them?

Originally posted by Omega Vision
What reaction do you want? Bomb them?

Good questions. So when someone does something should they be punished?

I could make a similar argument for guns.

When people kill each other using guns, should we take away the guns from all the people that don't?

Originally posted by Time-Immemorial
The fallout😂

So thats the end of the it then.

Yeah, they'll have to deal with the consequences depending on the severity of the violation.

What do you propose?

Interesting so a country that violates UN resolutions is going to honor a deal from a country they hate.😂

1) We've yet to see if they actually did violate UN resolutions

2) You're comparing the severity of these missiles (if the above is true) with them violating the nuclear deal (hint: Nukes are far worse than standard missiles), ergo, the backlash would be worse

Nice dodge BTW.

They already have ICBM's. We already went over this.

I already said we should bomb them numerous times, how is that a dodge?

Then how is this a UN violation? Not saying it isn't, it just doesn't make sense considering and you've yet to provide a link.

There you go, you want to bomb them again. Alright then.

Originally posted by Robtard
Then how is this a UN violation? Not saying it isn't, it just doesn't make sense considering and you've yet to provide a link.

There you go, you want to bomb them again. Alright then.

Like I said, Wolf talked about it on the news, I don't have his source yet.

I just find it funny that for all your "Iran is evil, they want to kill everyone" posts, you're the one that wants to bomb Iran and kill civilians (cos that happens many a time when you drop bombs).

Originally posted by Robtard
I just find it funny that for all your "Iran is evil, they want to kill everyone" posts, you're the one that wants to bomb Iran and kill civilians (cos that happens many a time when you drop bombs).

Unless they are putting there nuke families in the city, how do you know civilians will die? Obama has been killing civilians in Iraq and Afghanistan the past 8 years, you didn't seem to mind.

Believe it or not, bomb and missile strikes are not always 100% accurate.

I've been against the Iraq war from the start. But nice Obama deflection 👆

IMO, the UN should sanction you, you seem far more unstable than Iran.

Originally posted by Robtard
Believe it or not, bomb and missile strikes are not always 100% accurate.

I've been against the Iraq war from the start. But nice Obama deflection 👆

IMO, the UN should sanction you, you seem far more unstable than Iran.

So a few dead to prevent nuclear war and a war in the middle east?

Obama has been killing people for 7 years and I never seen you had a problem with it.