Is this thread asking who is actually more durable or who has the highest durability feats?
Regular Thor's highest durability feats are superior to Doomsday's best. Yes, including being one-shot killed by Imperiex (Not sure why his durability failing is relevant).
If we use the most powerful and durable incarnation of Thor then that just legitimasizes any high end feats as plausible. Why can't King Thor easily repeat any high end showings of regular Thor? It becomes a stomp in either direction.
Originally posted by Rage.Of.Olympus
Is this thread asking who is actually more durable or who has the highest durability feats?Regular Thor's highest durability feats are superior to Doomsday's best. Yes, including being one-shot killed by Imperiex (Not sure why his durability failing is relevant).
If we use the most powerful and durable incarnation of Thor then that just legitimasizes any high end feats as plausible. Why can't King Thor easily repeat any high end showings of regular Thor? It becomes a stomp in either direction.
Rage, do you mind posting the scans of Thor tanking the Celestial's attacks and returning fire so we can simultaneously end this debate and expose abhi's lies by omission?
Originally posted by abhilegend
Of what? Thor taking attacks from celestials? That's from Thor 300. My scans take place in Thor 301.Ergo, later.
Ah, but you are fully aware of the scans from Thor 300 that clearly end this debate...
You omit them because you know Doomsday has nothing to compare to them...
Originally posted by TheLordofMurder
Ah, but you are fully aware of the scans from Thor 300 that clearly end this debate...You omit them because you know Doomsday has nothing to compare to them...
Even you can't be this inane.
Originally posted by Rage.Of.Olympus
Is this thread asking who is actually more durable or who has the highest durability feats?Regular Thor's highest durability feats are superior to Doomsday's best. Yes, including being one-shot killed by Imperiex (Not sure why his durability failing is relevant).
If we use the most powerful and durable incarnation of Thor then that just legitimasizes any high end feats as plausible. Why can't King Thor easily repeat any high end showings of regular Thor? It becomes a stomp in either direction.
Thor isn't even near Superman in durability, much less Doomsday.
Oh the thorbags.............
Originally posted by TheLordofMurder
@abhiMy argument is that Thor endured multiple attacks from the merciless Classic Celestials and kept on fighting...
This is true and beyond argument...
Doomsday has nothing that compares to this and you know it...
Like it or not, Thor wins give the parameters of the thread presented in the OP...
So, not tanking. Do you want to compare Superman and Thor's durability feats?
Because Doomsday doesn't appear in 10000 issues like Thor. Superman does and Doomsday is measured up against Superman.
Wanna try?
Originally posted by abhilegend
He nearly died by those attacks.So, not tanking. Do you want to compare Superman and Thor's durability feats?
Because Doomsday doesn't appear in 10000 issues like Thor. Superman does and Doomsday is measured up against Superman.
Wanna try?
He did tank them; he withstood the 1st two attacks and couldn't take anymore after the 3rd...
So once again, he absolutely tanked multiple Celestial attacks...
Originally posted by abhilegend
Thor nearly died by those attacks as revealed in Thor 301.Even you can't be this inane.
Haha, are you trying to say Thor is more durable than Doomsday?Thor isn't even near Superman in durability, much less Doomsday.
Oh the thorbags.............
Can you not read?
This thread isn't about who you think is more durable. It's about who has better durability feats.
There's a distinction. If you can't understand that, I cannot help you.
Originally posted by TheLordofMurder
He did tank them; he withstood the 1st two attacks and couldn't take anymore after the 3rd...So once again, he absolutely tanked multiple Celestial attacks...
So, no tanking.
Originally posted by Rage.Of.Olympus
Can you not read?This thread isn't about who you think is more durable. It's about who has better durability feats.
There's a distinction. If you can't understand that, I cannot help you.
😂
Originally posted by TheLordofMurder
Now argue with that abhi...Thor TRADING SHOTS against merciless Classic Celestials...
Thor didnt admit defeat until after the 3rd attack and even then kept on going...
Doomsday has absolutely [b]nothing
to compare to this...Thor wins... [/B]
Doomsday laughs at puny gods like Thor in durability.
It's like talking to a wall.