Mace Windu vs Palpatine (ROTS)

Started by FreshestSlice3 pages

The world would be such a better place if people stopped seriously responding to quan.

Quan's fun, though.

Quan's not bad, it's all the replies he gets that are so ****ing retarded.

Originally posted by FreshestSlice
The world would be such a better place if people stopped seriously responding to quan.

Originally posted by FreshestSlice
The world would be such a better place if people stopped seriously responding to quan.
Silence, judas.

Originally posted by quanchi112
Luke was better so yeah. Anakin met Obi and he won later. Yoda is a failure. The victory wasn't as definitive as Luke's over Vader. That was pretty dominant.

So say if Vader used his force powers and actaully tried to fight. Luke's won was against a Vader who wasn't trying. The proof is there, just watch the films. This debate is won for me.

Originally posted by EmperorSidious2
So say if Vader used his force powers and actaully tried to fight. Luke's won was against a Vader who wasn't trying. The proof is there, just watch the films. This debate is won for me.
Vader swung his saber and taunted Luke. He fought but since you claimed he held back and didn't fight then prove it. You just say he didn't fight without any proof from the films.

Edit: wrong thread

Originally posted by quanchi112
Vader swung his saber and taunted Luke. He fought but since you claimed he held back and didn't fight then prove it. You just say he didn't fight without any proof from the films.

It's his son. That's really all the proof that's needed. He doesn't want to kill his own son. He says so in ESB. He doesn't want to kill his own son.

Even if Windu will be able to beat Sidious in sabers again, he wont beat him in all-out. Sidious every single time

Originally posted by quanchi112
You just say he didn't fight without any proof from the films.
why does the proof have to be from the films?

Originally posted by EmperorSidious2
It's his son. That's really all the proof that's needed. He doesn't want to kill his own son. He says so in ESB. He doesn't want to kill his own son.
In esp he still would if he were forced to but didn't have to try then. Luke owned him in rotj. The advantages for Luke were pretty clear. He's better.

Originally posted by Sinious
why does the proof have to be from the films?
So you believe directors don't leave proof to what's going on in the films they direct ? Is the goal of the scenes to confuse people here ?

Originally posted by quanchi112
So you believe directors don't leave proof to what's going on in the films they direct ? Is the goal of the scenes to confuse people here ?
Yawn.

This is an Expended Universe forum buddy. You being ignorant when it comes to EU isn't gonna change that fact. 👆

Originally posted by Sinious
Yawn.

This is an Expended Universe forum buddy. You being ignorant when it comes to EU isn't gonna change that fact. 👆

Default rules canon only unless otherwise stated. Disney 86'd eu and the default rules support Disney's views since they actually call the shots not you.

Originally posted by quanchi112
In esp he still would if he were forced to but didn't have to try then. Luke owned him in rotj. The advantages for Luke were pretty clear. He's better.

So you basically concede as you said if he were forced to. His outlook has changed from ESB. He doesn't want to kill his son no matter what. He now stops and considers everything now. Luke was going up against a Vader who wasn't trying. Luke's only advantage would be with agility and possibly strength. Besides that Vader is more skilled, powerful, durable, more experienced, and all around better. Vader is leagues ahead.

Originally posted by EmperorSidious2
So you basically concede as you said if he were forced to. His outlook has changed from ESB. He doesn't want to kill his son no matter what. He now stops and considers everything now. Luke was going up against a Vader who wasn't trying. Luke's only advantage would be with agility and possibly strength. Besides that Vader is more skilled, powerful, durable, more experienced, and all around better. Vader is leagues ahead.
No, he knew it was still his son. He swings his saber at his son. Prove your claims. In debating when you say someone isn't trying the onus is on you to prove it. Luke raped him.

Originally posted by quanchi112
No, he knew it was still his son. He swings his saber at his son. Prove your claims. In debating when you say someone isn't trying the onus is on you to prove it. Luke raped him.

Exactly it's his son. Why kill your own son. Again a lot happened within the time frame of ESB and ROTJ. Well considering I have proved it. Vader could have killed Luke if he chooses to. His force powers and his saber skills are better.

ES2, are you stupid?

Depends on who you ask.