Re: Which is more durable???
Originally posted by carver9
Cap Shield
Mjlonir
Pure Adamantium
Juggernaut skin
Green Lantern Ring
Thanos shieldsName the top 3 please.
You have to specify the size and shape of adamantium.
You have to specify which interpretation of Juggs, forcefield Juggs, or none forcefield Juggs.
You have to specify blunt force or energy projection durability.
Originally posted by Stoic
Cap's shield can't be more durable than Mjolnir. It was put to the test when King Thor hit the shield. The shield rumpled, and Mjolnir did not crack even slightly. To drill this point in even further, the shield was improved with the same substance that Mjolnir is made of after the Serpent broke it.So currently:
1. Mjolnir/Cap's shield (post augmentation)
2. Pure Adamantium
3. Cain's Skin with forcefield.
Mjolnir's durability depends on who is in possession. The Odin force fortifies Mjolnir more. For example, we know that Destroyer is more durable than Mjolnir since it's made from same metal and empowered by more things. But King Thor decapitated Destroyer with Mjolnir.
Originally posted by h1a8
Mjolnir's durability depends on who is in possession. The Odin force fortifies Mjolnir more. For example, we know that Destroyer is more durable than Mjolnir since it's made from same metal and empowered by more things. But King Thor decapitated Destroyer with Mjolnir.
Diff spells and enchantments, though.
Originally posted by h1a8
Mjolnir's durability depends on who is in possession. The Odin force fortifies Mjolnir more. For example, we know that Destroyer is more durable than Mjolnir since it's made from same metal and empowered by more things. But King Thor decapitated Destroyer with Mjolnir.
Originally posted by h1a8
Mjolnir's durability depends on who is in possession. The Odin force fortifies Mjolnir more. For example, we know that Destroyer is more durable than Mjolnir since it's made from same metal and empowered by more things. But King Thor decapitated Destroyer with Mjolnir.
Where was it written? I know that the Destroyer used to be known as more durable and not entirely made of the same substance, but retcons are known to occur. These days, just about anyone is able to slag that armor, so it has slightly been reduced in stature as opposed to what it used to be. Anyway I do agree that it really does depend on the size of the Adamantium as Riv made a similar statement earlier. I may be mistaken but I was under the impression that Carver may have been thinking of it being as thick as a fire door?