Who is Sidney Blumenthal

Started by Time-Immemorial3 pages

Originally posted by Robtard
Honestly don't recall you putting him on ignore, as I thought you thought people who use the ignore function are "pussies and cowards", per your own words. So moving on.

Anyhow, do watch the hearing. There's clips online if you missed Hillary slaughtering. When she openly laughs/mocks at how they're failing to verbally subdue her, you can almost see their souls being sucked out.

Good keep going on about it too, you knew I put him on ignore because we had a huge falling out and the mods even made a thread about putting people on ignore to save from getting banned.

Are you going to continue to be a little dip about it?

And your wrong again, Insane Titan came up with that slogan.

Try again.

I already explained that I didn't know you had put him on ignore or if I did, I had forgotten. But I suspect I never knew, considering you had at one point thought that the ignore list was for "pussies and cowards". So why would I just assume you had used it? But as I said, "moving on". <--- that means I was/am done , unless you want to continue.

Didn't claim you invented it, just that believed in the saying. You had it on your profile. But hey, things change, so moving on with that as well.

I can tell you really want the last word, go ahead and have it.

Also TMYK.

http://www.killermovies.com/forums/f11/t618878.html

When I say "moving on" and you continue to bring up a topic you apparently don't want to discuss, how am I supposed to respond?

Yeah, thanks, already saw that thread, since it's a sticky. I'm not flaming though.

Originally posted by Robtard
When I say "moving on" and you continue to bring up a topic you apparently don't want to discuss, how am I supposed to respond?

Yeah, thanks, already saw that thread, since it's a sticky. I'm not flaming though.

Thats not what I am talking about. Im talking about the were they suggest to put people on ignore. Bardock already admitted a few times he was confrontational on purpose and we would never agree on anything. So whats the point of circling bans and disrupting the forum in the process.

Alright, just like to point out that you're the one bringing up Bardock42 again, not me. You have him on ignore. Noted. Moving on.

The hearing has been pretty amazing, really drove home some points like:

Republicans have no interest in educating the American people, for example hiding the questioning of Sidney Blumenthal is a perfect example of that.

The Republican led congress is mainly to blame (on the US side) for the deaths in Benghazi with their obstructionist and cost cutting agenda, making it impossible for embassies, consulates, etc. to be funded well enough.

Hillary is extremely capable, definitely the most qualified and skilled candidate in the running for president.

Yeah, kind of crazy how what was supposed to ruin her, made her stronger and capable, while those attacking her weaker and incompetent.

She'll def use this in her campaign as "why I'm the most qualified out of my opponents". If she wins the nom and presidency, she can thanks the Republicans in part.

Originally posted by Robtard
Yeah, kind of crazy how what was supposed to ruin her, made her stronger and capable, while those attacking her weaker and incompetent.

She'll def use this in her campaign as "why I'm the most qualified out of my opponents". If she wins the nom and presidency, she can thanks the Republicans in part.

I mean, can you imagine Trump or Carson debating her on foreign policy? This is pretty much what would happen:

YouTube video

Originally posted by Robtard
Yeah, kind of crazy how what was supposed to ruin her, made her stronger and capable, while those attacking her weaker and incompetent.

She'll def use this in her campaign as "why I'm the most qualified out of my opponents". If she wins the nom and presidency, she can thanks the Republicans in part.

That doesn't even make sense, the whole reason she was there was because of her failure.

What part didn't you get? She failed in Lybia, that was merely a hearing which she volunteered to go to.

Originally posted by Time-Immemorial
That doesn't even make sense, the whole reason she was there was because of her failure.

What part didn't you get? She failed in Lybia, that was merely a hearing which she volunteered to go to.

She was, allegedly, there to give further testimony as to what could have been done better in the situation. A failure on her part may be something that may be uncovered, however it hasn't been, on the contrary, it has shown her to be not a failure at all and be a very capable stateswoman.

Originally posted by Bardock42
I mean, can you imagine Trump or Carson debating her on foreign policy? This is pretty much what would happen:

YouTube video

LoL

Originally posted by Time-Immemorial
That doesn't even make sense, the whole reason she was there was because of her failure.

What part didn't you get? She failed in Lybia, that was merely a hearing which she volunteered to go to.

As noted by B42 above (hate to steal credit), her "failure" has yet to come out in this hearing thus far. Is it possible that by the time it ends they'll have something they can pin on her, sure, but I wouldn't bet on it, considering what we've seen. So far she's shown herself to be a exemplary stateswoman and a tiger with freaking laser-beam eyes when need be.

This is really turning out to her advantage up to this point; something she can def use in her campaign for POTUS. You can thanks the Right for this.

Originally posted by Robtard
As noted by B42 above (hate to steal credit), her "failure" has yet to come out in this hearing thus far.

Her failure is why she was there in the first place 😂

Originally posted by Robtard
LoL

Look who's being a racist bigot now.

Just going off nothing but the name alone I would think he writes children's books. Just has one of those kind of names to me.

Originally posted by Time-Immemorial
Her failure is why she was there in the first place 😂

We will see when the results of the hearing are released. Don't expect it anytime soon, the Witchhunters will want to save face and hope by the time they release it in the distance future, no one will remember that they failed. Would be my guess at least.

Originally posted by Time-Immemorial
Look who's being a racist bigot now.

Not me, so stop flaming and trolling.

Originally posted by Robtard
We will see when the results of the hearing are released. Don't expect it anytime soon, the Witchhunters will want to save face and hope by the time they release it in the distance future, no one will remember that they failed. Would be my guess at least.

Not me, so stop flaming and trolling.

Sigh...she was there because she failed.

Incorrect, she's there because some people** believe she failed. Why don't you wait until the official hearing report until condemning her? I'm waiting.

**though these same people kind of admitted it was just a political attack, despicable, using the deaths of Americans as a political bludgeon. Why do they hate America so much?

Originally posted by Robtard
No, she's there because some people** believe she failed. Why don't you wait until the official hearing report until condemning her? I'm waiting.

**though these same people kind of admitted it was just a political attack, despicable, using the deaths of Americas as a political bludgeon. Why do they hate America so much?

Oh I forgot, she succeeded in Benghazi.

What was I thinking?