Originally posted by -Pr-
When they started the show, the producers said it was going to be the prime universe (main timeline), but now, I dunno. My guess is that it isn't a reboot, but a reimagining. Modernise the shit out of it etc.Just... They went a bit far.
Very far. I'm not sure why they even bothered with a prequel style series anyways.
Originally posted by Stealth Moose
Very far. I'm not sure why they even bothered with a prequel style series anyways.
Something something Kirk prequel era Abrams etc.
==
http://ew.com/tv/2017/06/22/star-trek-discovery-diversity/
So-so article in general. The thing that stuck out to me was "never been done before". Why, because an ultra-progressive future where race and gender don't matter is somehow going to be different because she's black (like Sisko?) or a woman (like Janeway?).
There is a lot that Star Trek can do, but I really dislike this attitude that the casting alone is somehow breaking new ground.
Personally, I'm more worried about her being a Mary Sue. First human ever to go to the Vulcan science academy? Yeah, that'll go well, if they follow established canon.
Which they probably won't.
Originally posted by -Pr-
New trailer:
The un-Trekkiest Star Trek yet.
Originally posted by Flyattractor
[b]But how long has it been since Star Trek was "Star Trek"? [/B]
How long has it been since Enterprise ended? 13 years or so? Yeah. Trek is best when they have a chance to develop the characters. It's easier to do when you have 22 40 minute episodes per season as opposed to 2 hour long movies that come every 2-3 years.
The quality of the movies is dipping though. I have tried 3 separate times to watch Star Trek Beyond. The furthest I have gotten is like an hour into it.