Originally posted by TrocityPost the quote then. I've seen Vader move in real time much slower than Palpatine in real time. That's quantifiable.
>Vader moved faster than Sidious
>hyperboleSo they said Vader moved faster than Sidious and exaggerated to show that... Vader was really moving slower than Sidious.
Originally posted by quanchi112
Luke wasn't abnormally slow. Vader is slow as he is slow in rebels. Slow and powerful like he's a,ways been portrayed.
Luke was meant to be faster. All the characters are. The technology back then made that impossible. Vader isn't slow. Read some canon novels like Lords of the Sith or The Dark Lord the rise of Darth Vader.
Originally posted by EmperorSidious2So you admit Luke was faster because he was portrayed as faster not that Vader's speed was impossible to portray.
Luke was meant to be faster. All the characters are. The technology back then made that impossible. Vader isn't slow. Read some canon novels like Lords of the Sith or The Dark Lord the rise of Darth Vader.
Watch him on rebels. Same slow and powerful guy.
Originally posted by quanchi112
So you admit Luke was faster because he was portrayed as faster not that Vader's speed was impossible to portray.Watch him on rebels. Same slow and powerful guy.
Did you miss the part where I said he was meant to be faster or are you just stupid. I personally think both.
Again meant to be faster. Also with that you must say Kanan and Ezra are slow because he showed no problem keeping up with them, or Luke since he could keep up with Luke and you pride yourself on using the choreography. You must think Vader is faster than all of them or at that level since he could keep up.
Originally posted by EmperorSidious2No need to insult you crossed the line.
Did you miss the part where I said he was meant to be faster or are you just stupid. I personally think both.Again meant to be faster. Also with that you must say Kanan and Ezra are slow because he showed no problem keeping up with them, or Luke since he could keep up with Luke and you pride yourself on using the choreography. You must think Vader is faster than all of them or at that level since he could keep up.
Luke was fine as faster since the effects show it was possible Vader was just slower. They are unskilled or inferior to Vader in both dueling and force powers.
Luke crushed Vader. 😂
Originally posted by quanchi112
No need to insult you crossed the line.Luke was fine as faster since the effects show it was possible Vader was just slower. They are unskilled or inferior to Vader in both dueling and force powers.
Luke crushed Vader. 😂
What line? There is no line with you.
I'm sorry but Luke wasn't fast. At all. Those are movements acrobats can do, or many other people. Vader isn't slow. He just uses his speed in different ways to equip his fighting style.
1) Not due to speed.
2) Vader defintlly allowed him to win or just didn't fight back agisnst his own son.
Originally posted by EmperorSidious2You crossed the line.
What line? There is no line with you.I'm sorry but Luke wasn't fast. At all. Those are movements acrobats can do, or many other people. Vader isn't slow. He just uses his speed in different ways to equip his fighting style.
1) Not due to speed.
2) Vader defintlly allowed him to win or just didn't fight back agisnst his own son.
Luke was fast and portrayed as fast. Watch his jump and his hand movements. Vader is slow and nowhere near as manuverable as Luke.
1) yes.
2). Prove it.