Originally posted by Time-Immemorial
Actually that is a rich play ground, they import workers and the workers live in ghetto's.Pwned you both.
So like every western country except the workers are inside their borders?
Originally posted by Time-Immemorial
Actually that is a rich play ground, they import workers and the workers live in ghetto's.Pwned you both.
So like every western country except the workers are inside their borders?
Originally posted by Time-Immemorial
Actually that is a rich play ground, they import workers and the workers live in ghetto's.Pwned you both.
We have separation of church and state bc the country isn't made up of one belief system. Even in one of the most Christian nations in the world, to base policy off of a religion would alienate literally tens of millions of people (to say nothing of WHICH version of Christianity it should be). The founders may have been Christian, they may have been deists, and those beliefs may or may not resemble what Christians believe today. But it was written by a bunch of angry ex-Brits in a room. Let's remember that as well.
So I feel like the answer to OP's question is - or should be - irrelevant.
So, to me, neither is more Constitutional. It's not a religious document, and remains apart from supposedly divine texts of religions. Even if you think the Bible was written by - or at least inspired by - God and His Word, let's agree that the Constitution was written by people and remains a distinctly human document first and foremost. To try to apply religious sensibilities to a secular document (or even if there are tinges of religiosity in the document itself, it serves a diverse population in a secular government) is dangerous, imo.
Also, TI invoking Islamic States is a bit of a non-sequitar, and unfortunately reveals the agenda here. That discussion, though, is a much deeper one than "which is better right now?" because we're working from stereotypes oftentimes, impartial information other times, and economic and educational forces have as much or more to do with extremism than strictly religious forces. Basically, it's a much more nuanced beast than I'd expect we have the capacity for here.
Originally posted by Arabian KnightI would go to war with you.
Islam is a peaceful religion built upon pillars of faith, charity and love. I guarantee you would not be saying these evil things against Allah's prophet Muhammad pbuh and his religion in my country! You'd be rightfully beaten by every good able bodied Muslim !
Because some terror groups kill in the name of Islam.... But just be cause a few groups kill in the name of religion does not make the whole religion violent. That's like saying because the KKK was a Christian group that makes all Christians are racist or let's not forget about the Oklahoma City bombing
Originally posted by Time-Immemorial
It seems to me Islam is protected here and Christianity is bashed repeatidly.Anyone know why?
Yes, we all know it is. As for why, I believe it's because Satan hates Christ but he knows that "Allah" is fake so it doesn't bother him to see people praising a God who doesn't actually exist. He probably laughs about it, as a matter of a fact. Whether people wanna admit it or not or believe in him or not his influence over this world is extremely strong and he is superbly cunning. Fortunately, he can't sway those of us who have unshakeable faith in Christ no matter what that loser does. Make no mistake, the real enemy of humanity is not ISIS, climate change (LOL), PC liberals, or even the ugly disgusting Hilldog but instead Satan himself.