Anonymous promises to dox hundreds of KKK members.

Originally posted by Surtur
Yeah see the biggest problem is, despite the reputation of Anonymous..nobody will have any way to really verify 100% of the names are indeed true members of the KKK.

Here is the thing, I would applaud revealing the true members of the KKK. On the other hand I don't trust Anonymous 100%, I don't care how good they are.

Or perhaps they were a KKK member at one time but have since grown to no longer believe in it. If the list old that person's name could be on it.

I wonder what the world would have been like without democrates starting planned parenthood and the KKK.

Interesting historical fact: the KKK actually had meetings with Malcolm X. See Malcolm, for some reasons I can legitimately understand, wanted whites and blacks separate just as much as the KKK did. I like how he sought to use his enemy to his potential advantage. Nothing ever really came of it though.

Originally posted by Bashar Teg
they are not pinning attacks (as of yet). simply identifying members of a long-established organization most noted for murdering minorities under a veil of anonymity. but i suppose we'll just have to agree to disagree on that one. but i'll pose this question: if this was an american branch of ISIS, would you feel that they have the right to their anonymity? (not intended to call you out, just reframing the scenario for you to consider)

I mean people keep justifying this to themselves by some how claiming they deserve this. Does that mean they also deserve to get fires from their jobs? Should they be put in prison. I'm sorry but just because they would treat people differently does not mean I believe the same thing.

As for ISIS. That could be slightly different considering ISIS itself has made claims to actually attack our country. Therefore I think it is reasonable to say that people identifying as ISIS could be a part of that plan to attack.

Of course it still comes with the same problems of verifying the list to be correct in the first place and investigations would have to follow to see if they were planning any attacks.

There is also the fact to consider though even if they did have a list of true active members it would still put innocent people at risk. Not every KKK member has their entire family in the clan. I'm sure some do, but it can't be all of them. The people related to these people would also be under threat.

For instance what if a clan member has 2 yr. old child? Now the child is in danger too. You could argue the father would be ultimately responsible, but the list itself is what would be endangering the kids.

a 2 year old child will not post on twitter as a kkk member. thats how they compiled the names. it's not like they found a member list.

Originally posted by Bashar Teg
a 2 year old child will not post on twitter as a kkk member. thats how they compiled the names. it's not like they found a member list.

Originally posted by Jesus McBurger
😂 i laughed so hard at this

i did a bit as well. some cute little pudgy blond baby with a white hood, typing about exterminating the negro virus from clean white america. then spitting up some gerber formula and crying.

Originally posted by Bashar Teg
a 2 year old child will not post on twitter as a kkk member. thats how they compiled the names. it's not like they found a member list.

But this isn't actually relevant if they track the person down by the list. Strangely enough I wasn't talking about the child's social media presence being at risk, or that one existed at all.

Originally posted by Bashar Teg
a 2 year old child will not post on twitter as a kkk member. thats how they compiled the names. it's not like they found a member list.

He said an exposed clan member with a 2 year old child. As in the child could be in danger from someone targeting the exposed parent.

Don't get me wrong though I'm all for images of babies dressed inappropriately in hateful clothing. Babies in Nazi Attire particularly tickle me.

Just picture it..a baby with a little Hitler mustache and he is mis-pronouncing "crematorium" in a cute way.

Originally posted by Newjak
That's not what he said though.

He said an exposed clan member with a 2 year old child. As in the child could be in danger from someone targeting the exposed parent.

heh yeah i misread. in my defense, we've all seen children dressed up by their "parents" in kkk robes at marches.

lifting a veil of anonymity and attacking someone are not the same thing, though. that's why foxnews has had impunity to dox abortion doctors and not be held accountable when they get murdered. whether or not you think this should be the case, it is, and it's nothing new.

Originally posted by Bashar Teg
heh yeah i misread. in my defense, we've all seen children dressed up by their "parents" in kkk robes at marches.

lifting a veil of anonymity and attacking someone are not the same thing, though. that's why foxnews has had impunity to dox abortion doctors and not be held accountable when they get murdered. whether or not you think this should be the case, it is, and it's nothing new.

I hate the precedent of us saying well it's just stupid racists therefore it's okay in this instance. Like well okay it's okay if we dislike the group of people that is being targeted.

Originally posted by Time-Immemorial
I wonder what the world would have been like without democrates starting planned parenthood and the KKK.

I guess those were "Conservative Democrats" like you. Which today would be Republicans...also like you.

Originally posted by Surtur
So it seems when they aren't harassing 13 yr. old girls Anonymous at times might actually perform morally praiseworthy acts.

We have a few people on the forum that have been caught harassing/dating underage girls, its nothing new.

Originally posted by Newjak
To be fair I don't like when Fox News does that either. And I never said it was illegal I just think it's silly for us to want to unmask these people so badly when we all talk about the right to privacy. How bad the NSA is for spying.

I hate the precedent of us saying well it's just stupid racists therefore it's okay in this instance. Like well okay it's okay if we dislike the group of people that is being targeted.

i do understand your concern. in the context of the old andrew mccarthy communist witch hunt, it's frightening to imagine where it could lead.

however there still is the issue that this is not a doxing of white supremacist organizations, but rather of a particular one directly tied to a long historical string of murders, as well the duality of often holding powerful positions on a municipal and even state level. that's a line i'm comfortable with, so long as it's not crossed and organizations are being investigated simply for being ignorant douchebags.

Originally posted by Time-Immemorial
We have a few people on the forum that have been caught harassing/dating underage girls, its nothing new.

Originally posted by Bashar Teg
i did a bit as well. some cute little pudgy blond baby with a white hood, typing about exterminating the negro virus from clean white america. then spitting up some gerber formula and crying.

Originally posted by Bardock42
I guess those were "Conservative Democrats" like you. Which today would be Republicans...also like you.

I bet he is wearing his "Che" shirt as he posted that.

And Democrats do spread more hate speech then even the KKK do nowadays.

Much like Bardy,

go away clown. you're spattering rainbow-colored feces everywhere.