Would Starkiller have made a better Jedi contact than Ahsoka?

Would Starkiller have made a better leader over Ahsoka? He's far more powerful than Kanan, Ezra, Obi-Wan and Ahsoka. In a fight Ahsoka doesn't stand a chance against Vader, so would have Starkiller made a better leader than the apprentice who quit before her training was completed?

Anakin's song:
https://youtu.be/NKDt8Ks-LYw

No to everything you just said.

Well, Starkiller's leadership skills isn't all that impressive, or, to avoid euphemisms, is pretty shit.
So, nah. Pure power against foes more powerful than you is short-bus logic.

No.

Starkiller couldn't train anyone, he's kinda dumb and he's emotionally unstable. He's also not a Jedi and would likely lead Ezra and Kanan to the darkside.

Originally posted by Nephthys
He's also not a Jedi and would likely lead Ezra and Kanan to the darkside.

Considering at this point he's something like 2 years from the start of the game and is thus a loyal Dark Side apprentice to Vader.... I'm going to say 'that would be bad.'

The Rebellion was started by Starkiller, so the fact that there even is a Rebellion probably means that the original Starkiller was already killed, and the clone Starkiller was either on his way, or already involved.

As for Starkiller not being a Jedi, not entirely true. He was a Jedi when he fell to Sidious and one of the clones is a Jedi as well.

I do agree that he's not exactly the most strategic, but he could still serve as an iconic leader on the frontlines, and plus any Force User could turn the tide of any war.

Lastly, not emotionally stable? Not really. He was pretty damn stable, and he knew what his goals were (mostly to get laid). Sure, a bit selfish and a bit of a temper when Vader almost kills Juno. Aside from that, he's very stable.

Originally posted by jmoul
The Rebellion was started by Starkiller, so the fact that there even is a Rebellion probably means that the original Starkiller was already killed, and the clone Starkiller was either on his way, or already involved.

LMFAO

Originally posted by Darth Truculent
Would Starkiller have made a better leader over Ahsoka? He's far more powerful than Kanan, Ezra, Obi-Wan and Ahsoka. In a fight Ahsoka doesn't stand a chance against Vader, so would have Starkiller made a better leader than the apprentice who quit before her training was completed?

Anakin's song:
https://youtu.be/NKDt8Ks-LYw

Hell, Ahsoka could beat Vader, and shes about to cut him down out of anger.

Then Kanan and Ezra are all like "Don't do it!"

She puts away her lightsaber, and Vader stabs her in the back, killing her immediately.

Originally posted by |King Joker|

Everyones assuming Ahsoka is gonna put up a good fight but get beaten.

However, Disney could just ruin Vader by having him lose to Ahsoka, and resort to making him take a cheap shot to win.

Originally posted by jmoul
The Rebellion was started by Starkiller, so the fact that there even is a Rebellion probably means that the original Starkiller was already killed, and the clone Starkiller was either on his way, or already involved.

Starkiller was key to the formation of the rebel *alliance*. Rebellious factions already existed.

As for Starkiller not being a Jedi, not entirely true. He was a Jedi when he fell to Sidious and one of the clones is a Jedi as well.

Which is the future from here.

Originally posted by Q99
Starkiller was key to the formation of the rebel *alliance*. Rebellious factions already existed.

Cause thats never stated.

All we ever hear is that Kota knows people who have spoken out against the Emperor, which doesn't equal "rebellious faction".

Garm Bel Iblis's Corellian resistance, Kota's militia, The Eleven and Ferus Olin.

Note the people he rescued were rebel *leaders*. Implying they lead something.

Originally posted by Jmanghan

Everyones assuming Ahsoka is gonna put up a good fight but get beaten.

However, Disney could just ruin Vader by having him lose to Ahsoka, and resort to making him take a cheap shot to win.

Nah Disney likes money. And Vader probably sells more than any other SW character. They also seem to love his iconic status. So they're not going to degrade him like that.

👆 As they've made clear countless times.

Heck, one of the best things about the switch from Legends to the new continuity is, all of Vader's old lower showings got erased.

In the early days of the EU, they really didn't know how strong he was- he wasn't known to be the Chosen One after all, some assumed he was 'just' a Jedi Knight who'd gotten cyborged up and was possibly less fast because of it.

Tbh Vader should be solidly in the Top 5, I've always felt the whole suit thing..while it limited his potential shouldn't have capped his power as there's a difference. I mean they could still make him extremely powerful, yet he still is never gonna reach what he was gonna be.

So here's hoping to see what this new EU does for him, considering he's noted as being powerful still instead of the other way around.

Originally posted by Q99
Heck, one of the best things about the switch from Legends to the new continuity is, all of Vader's old lower showings got erased.

In the early days of the EU, they really didn't know how strong he was- he wasn't known to be the Chosen One after all, some assumed he was 'just' a Jedi Knight who'd gotten cyborged up and was possibly less fast because of it.