Legends Cin Drallig vs Grand Inquisitor

Who wins?

Legends Cin Drallig is still unimpressive.

The Inquisitor has nothing on him; Cin should sweep.

Originally posted by FreshestSlice
Legends Cin Drallig is still unimpressive.

👆

Drallig

Originally posted by NewGuy01
The Inquisitor has nothing on him; Cin should sweep.

Cin Drallig, He's a Battlemaster who's skills are acknowledged by Dooku and considered a threat to General Grievous in the same book that he solo'd four Jedi Masters.
Inqusitor gets curbstomped

Also bring all the Dave Filoni quotes you want, as they are about as consistent as throwing horseshoes blindfolded

No one who loses in two to three hits is curbstomping anyone. Like anyone.

hes better than ti tho

Kolar got blitzed/one shot and stomped Vos.

Originally posted by FreshestSlice
No one who loses in two to three hits is curbstomping anyone. Like anyone.

Agen Kolar, Kit Fisto, Saesee Tiin confirmedd fodder then 🙄

Dooku himself said Cin Drallig could give Grievous trouble, who wouldn't even break a sweet against Inquisitors

Drallig solidly

Originally posted by Kosmos Supreme
Agen Kolar, Kit Fisto, Saesee Tiin confirmedd fodder then 🙄

Dooku himself said Cin Drallig could give Grievous trouble, who wouldn't even break a sweet against Inquisitors

Originally posted by FreshestSlice
I like how you think Anakin wouldn't get his shit stomped in by Sidious. I don't care what Dooku says. The evidence shows that Drallig is nowhere near a threat to Grievous, let alone the Inquisitor.

I don't think Anakin could match Sidious, but i just think your logicic is flawed

also you think The Inqusitor > Grievous 😘

Have any actual arguments, or more of what Dooku said?

Drallig was a master of all lightsaber forms, whereas the Inquisitor is just a user of them. Also I doubt he could use his psychobabble to faze Drallig much at all.

Also the Inquisitors lightsaber is shit.

Originally posted by FreshestSlice
Have any actual arguments, or more of what Dooku said?

I strongly believe his credentials as battlemaster and one of the greatest swordsman of the era put him vastly above an Inquisitor (who's only trained in the basics of the dark side)
Mind backing up the Inquisitor > Grievous claim.

Ahsoka was able to challenge Grevious as a Padawan and as much as my more Ahsoka leaned associates would like me to believe the Inquisitor can't face a Padawan, I don't.

Second, his credentials aren't replacements for feats, and the only fight we've ever seen him in ended horribly. So no, unless you actually have an instance of Drallig accomplishing anything, he doesn't defeat the Inquisitor. Certainly not because he's Battlemaster, which had implied technical mastery at best.

Being a Padawan doesn't mean your weak in Star Wars, Anakin held his own against Dooku for a couple minutes.
Ironic how you dismiss Status as a indicator of strength for Drallig. Yet use it as an example of why Ahsoka can't be above the Inqusitor because she's a Padawan.
Hypocrite