Pre Retcon Molecule Man Vs DePowered Tyrant

Started by Galan0075 pages

Originally posted by 8swords
and correct me if im wrong but isnt writer=TOAA >>>marvel god??
No. This is one of the more retarded myths I've seen propagated here.

TOAA IS Marvel's "God". They are the same thing.

I thought God was still God, at both Marvel and DC.

Originally posted by riv6672
I thought God was still God, at both Marvel and DC.

On panel "God" : Presence, Original Infinity Being, etc.. are at the mercy of TOAA aka the writers.

TOAA > everything on panel.

Originally posted by riv6672
I thought God was still God, at both Marvel and DC.
TOAA is a fictional representation of the RW writers. IOW, he is a comic book character. Obviously the most powerful comic book character in Marvel, but a comic book character nonetheless.

That's why, when TOAA appeared in F4 #511, he explicitly referred to himself as "God":
http://i.imgur.com/2uvu0JY.jpg

That's why Thanos, when he wielded THOTI(TOAA's power), also referred to himself as "God":
http://i.imgur.com/xP6OhNR.png

IOW, the terms "TOAA" and "God" are used synonymously. IOW, they represent the same thing/being. 🙂

Contrary to zop's belief, there is no evidence that "TOAA/God" *only* refers to Marvel's real world staff. Again: TOAA is a fictional representation of the RW writers. IOW, he is a comic book character. Obviously the most powerful comic book character in Marvel, but a comic book character nonetheless.

But anyway, enough derailing this thread with the irrelevant. Owen obviously stomps.

Cool, thank you. 👆

Originally posted by zopzop

TOAA > everything on panel in Marvel.


Basically. I call em, TOAA-God.
Imo, there's a "God" tier in Marvel excluding TOAA. TOAA though, is above them all.

TOAA-God, is an illustrated fictional representation/character of the RW writers/artists, true.

ie. The Marvel omniverse/multiverse whateva and everything in it, and outside it (like the Beyonders)
is nothing but drawings on pieces of paper to this "character" called TOAA-God.

The Infinity being, who was eternal, infinite, with no beginning or natural end, the be all, end all,
is just a silly drawing to this character named TOAA-God.
Sise-Neg-Genesis, per writers' intent was the portrayal of "The" God, ...
just ink on paper that can be crumbled and tossed by TOAA-God.

There's several cats that have been depicted as all-powerful, control over all that is,
yet, they're very existence/relevance is dependent on the pencil of the drawing labeled TOAA-God.

So my point, I agree with G,
TOAA is definitely a character in Marvel that just happens to represent what we established.
But .. because they represent such, imo, they're on another level,
and shouldn't even be categorized with their drawings.

I mean, the God cat in FF#511 is talking about RW subjects like Silver Surfer and Black Panther comics, etc.
That's that absolute 4th wall power in the house
which is distinct from those that adhere and are restricted to the common comic book laws.

Originally posted by riv6672
Doom is all about tough love. Like Skipper with Private.

😂

Perfect comparison, yes.

^^^👆

And, heavy stuff from Mr Master.

Just because Demuirge was initially made from BSE doesn't imply that his or his descendant's source of power is BSE. For example, Surfer source of power is the cosmos. He literally absorbs any ambient energy or solid mass in the universe (both BSE and non BSE). Odin's energy source is clearly non BSE as well.

In other words, a character's makeup doesn't imply their power source.
Surfer could absorb 100% stellar energy. Does that mean he has BSE?

Originally posted by Mr Master
Basically. I call em, TOAA-God.
Imo, there's a "God" tier in Marvel excluding TOAA. TOAA though, is above them all.

TOAA-God, is an illustrated fictional representation/character of the RW writers/artists, true.

ie. The Marvel omniverse/multiverse whateva and everything in it, and outside it (like the Beyonders)
is nothing but drawings on pieces of paper to this "character" called TOAA-God.

The Infinity being, who was eternal, infinite, with no beginning or natural end, the be all, end all,
is just a silly drawing to this character named TOAA-God.
Sise-Neg-Genesis, per writers' intent was the portrayal of "The" God, ...
just ink on paper that can be crumbled and tossed by TOAA-God.

There's several cats that have been depicted as all-powerful, control over all that is,
yet, they're very existence/relevance is dependent on the pencil of the drawing labeled TOAA-God.

So my point, I agree with G,
TOAA is definitely a character in Marvel that just happens to represent what we established.
But .. because they represent such, imo, they're on another level,
and shouldn't even be categorized with their drawings.

I mean, the God cat in FF#511 is talking about RW subjects like Silver Surfer and Black Panther comics, etc.
That's that absolute 4th wall power in the house
which is distinct from those that adhere and are restricted to the common comic book laws.

So,TOAA>Beyonder?

This is the reason i didnt major in theology. 😆

Even when Marvels The End never mentions TOAA and the fact it wasn't Multiversal tells me no one has read it....

Beyonder (Pre-Retcon)=TOAA

Dont see why people are so defensive about it geez.

To be honest i dont even understand the defensiveness.

Originally posted by Mr Master
Basically. I call em, TOAA-God.
Imo, there's a "God" tier in Marvel excluding TOAA. TOAA though, is above them all.

TOAA-God, is an illustrated fictional representation/character of the RW writers/artists, true.

ie. The Marvel omniverse/multiverse whateva and everything in it, and outside it (like the Beyonders)
is nothing but drawings on pieces of paper to this "character" called TOAA-God.

The Infinity being, who was eternal, infinite, with no beginning or natural end, the be all, end all,
is just a silly drawing to this character named TOAA-God.
Sise-Neg-Genesis, per writers' intent was the portrayal of "The" God, ...
just ink on paper that can be crumbled and tossed by TOAA-God.

There's several cats that have been depicted as all-powerful, control over all that is,
yet, they're very existence/relevance is dependent on the pencil of the drawing labeled TOAA-God.

So my point, I agree with G,
TOAA is definitely a character in Marvel that just happens to represent what we established.
But .. because they represent such, imo, they're on another level,
and shouldn't even be categorized with their drawings.

I mean, the God cat in FF#511 is talking about RW subjects like Silver Surfer and Black Panther comics, etc.
That's that absolute 4th wall power in the house
which is distinct from those that adhere and are restricted to the common comic book laws.

I agree, but this would mean that a higher dimensional being shares the same relationship. For example, mxy (a 5th dimensional being) is analogous to TOAA since the D.C. Universe is just a piece of paper to him.
Probably that's how he is able to destroy and remake universes with the snap of his fingers.

Myxy i'm better at comprehending. 👆

Originally posted by riv6672
Myxy i'm better at comprehending. 👆

Wut........

True story.

Riv6672 you see that window?......can you stand near it lol.

Originally posted by BeyonderGod
Even when Marvels The End never mentions TOAA and the fact it wasn't Multiversal tells me no one has read it....

Beyonder (Pre-Retcon)=TOAA

Dont see why people are so defensive about it geez.

Because TOAA>Beyonder.

Its just the way it is.

Originally posted by Time-Immemorial
Because TOAA>Beyonder.

Its just the way it is.


Handbook and other evidence proves otherwise plus why are you talking to me? did you add me to the ignore list??