Battlefield 1

http://m.ign.com/articles/2015/12/12/dice-confirms-its-now-working-on-next-battlefield?utm_source=IGN%20hub%20page&utm_medium=IGN%20(front%20page)&utm_content=17&utm_campaign=Blogroll

The next Battlefield has been confirmed! Thank god DICE is back on it. Hardline was atrocious.

Bet you despite all that big talk campaigns are pointless, DICE is still going to add one for Battlefield 5.

Surprise!

Battlefield 4 was great (I was lucky I never ran into login issues) but what else can they do? They seriously need to do something different.

And you are probably right, a campaign will probably be included.

Battlefield(aside from Bad Company) isn't known for it's stupendous, A+++ blockbuster campaigns, but they're fun for what they are. Now if only they'd put a campaign on Battlefront lol.

DICE needs to work on the campaign for these games being actually good otherwise don't bother at all.

Originally posted by Nemesis X
Bet you despite all that big talk campaigns are pointless, DICE is still going to add one for Battlefield 5.

Atrocious is a strong word. They are not great but they are definitely not horrible. I enjoyed BF4 single player campaign especially the areas where they open up the map a bit.

I think they should create an open world type map with linear missions where big battles are organic and not follow the leader.

Campaigns should be mandatory. We already know that the multiplayer will be better than COD games,, so why not continue to include a a great aspect that COD is neglecting to include?

COD is almost always praised for it's short, but spectacular campaign. All the Black Ops stories were awesome, even if I didn't like the concept of BO3. It's just most people are so hooked on the multiplayer, they skip the campaign entirely no matter how good it is.

The last two COD games i've heard had some good campaigns for a COD game.

http://www.ign.com/articles/2016/02/26/battlefield-5-reportedly-set-in-world-war-1-according-to-retailer

A leak says BF5 will be set during WW1. Not sure I'm a fan of that. There's going to be a real lack of features if this is true (at least compared to past BFs). I would rather stick with modern warfare, though I wouldn't mind WW2.

That would be different. I think it would be a wait and see approach to see what they do. One thing though, it would be interesting on how they do the art design. It could be gorgeous in a depressing sort of way.

I think WW2 should be revisited for Battlefield. It would get away from the modern weapons and probably be a bit more skilled base. There is tons of battles, tanks, planes, anti air and anti tank. Hell, maybe they could add battleships and subs like they used to have in BF1942.

I'd be super interested in a WW1 Battlefield.

It will be definitely interesting. Well, at least more interesting than the "modern warfare" era.

I still think WW2 should be revisited over WW1 though. I'm not sure how BF will translate to WW1.

YouTube video

The full game has been leaked, DLCs and all. Its confirmed WWI. Best of all, its coming out this year.

10-26-2016

Hmm......WW1, I don't know how that is going to turn out.

It's not confirmed as WWI, even if that leak is true (which we're still not certain it is) then look at the names of the DLCs - it's a future setting, probably somewhere set before "Battlefield: 2142" but after "Battlefield 4".

Told ya its WWI. Its an alternate history WWI though. That could solve the lack of attachments and customization. Also, wtf is up with that numbering

http://www.theladbible.com/articles/details-on-the-next-battlefield-game-have-been-leaked-060516

c7nRTF2SowQ&utm

Just please no more silent protagonists. It's not hard to get one more voice in the ****ing game.