Is Obama the anti-Christ?

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PlT9SYR6jq4

You decide after watching this eye-opening 4:13 video.

Personally, I think he's too stupid but the short You Tube video in link above has me wondering.

He is anti-christ, don't know if he is the actual anti christ.

He does have people here calling him a god king though.

If he is the anti-christ then what a horrible ant-christ he is. Jesse from Supernatural was more threatening. You'd think the anti-christ would be one of the most evil men to walk the face of the Earth, but Obama doesn't fit that category.

The anti-christ should be someone where even Hitler looks at him and goes "dude has issues".

The Anti-Christ (really, the False Prophet) was openly anti-Christ, hence the name! Obama is openly Christian. Therefore, he fails in the qualification.

This is more 'I don't like someone therefore I'll assign a negative role to them, no matter how little it fits,' stuff.

Btw, I think every president, or at least every democratic president, gets called the anti-Christ. It's so empty.

Just like every republican president gets called Hitler..

I've had enough of your smart ass remarks.

I don't think the Antichrist will come from the U.S. The Bible seems to indicate he will arise from a revived Roman Empire. The EU fits that description.

Originally posted by Time-Immemorial

I've had enough of your smart ass remarks.

Just because you've had enough of being called on being wrong doesn't make you any less wrong 🙂

You could always try doing more research before posting, or stop exaggerating everything you don't like because you don't like it til it doesn't resemble the reality.

You have never proved me wrong on anything and you certainly didn't just prove me wrong on anything I just said.

Nice try dodger.

Originally posted by Time-Immemorial
Just like every republican president gets called Hitler..

This cheapens the name of Hitler though. It makes him sound like your average dick when people compare others to Hitler and it's not an apt comparison.

😂

Plus think of it another way: calling him the AC gives him an excuse. Think about it, if he's doing shady things on his own that is one thing, but if he was specifically created to be evil then he is doing nothing but playing the role God gave him.

Originally posted by Time-Immemorial
You have never proved me wrong on anything and you certainly didn't just prove me wrong on anything I just said.

I point out facts that disagree with your points. You then get pissed off and insist that anything I say is wrong because I say it, but that's just you being a sore loser.

Throwing a hissy fit when you're shown to be wrong doesn't make you not-wrong.

Here, for example? The anti-Christ was openly anti-Christ in the Bible. That is self evidently not Obama. Therefore your stance was wrong.

Nice try dodger

If by 'dodger,' you mean 'regularly points out flaws with what you're saying, regularly using citations of the original source we're discussing' (book of revelations in this case).

To which you usually do stuff like complain about how I use too many words and run off....

Face it, you are not good at arguing, and retreat when proven wrong, a lot. You're only 'not proven wrong' in your own head, and calling 'Here is precisely where you are wrong with citations,' dodging is only a sign how far you'll go to avoid admitting being wrong.

I disagree and you didn't prove me wrong here.

Originally posted by Time-Immemorial
I disagree and you didn't prove me wrong here.

Originally posted by Q99
I point out facts that disagree with your points. You then get pissed off and insist that anything I say is wrong because I say it, but that's just you being a sore loser.

Throwing a hissy fit when you're shown to be wrong doesn't make you not-wrong.

Here, for example? The anti-Christ was openly anti-Christ in the Bible. That is self evidently not Obama. Therefore your stance was wrong.

If by 'dodger,' you mean 'regularly points out flaws with what you're saying, regularly using citations of the original source we're discussing' (book of revelations in this case).

To which you usually do stuff like complain about how I use too many words and run off....

Face it, you are not good at arguing, and retreat when proven wrong, a lot. You're only 'not proven wrong' in your own head, and calling 'Here is precisely where you are wrong with citations,' dodging is only a sign how far you'll go to avoid admitting being wrong.

I think the only you have to face is the truth, and the truth is liberalism has failed, Obama has failed, and America is coming back around to is original values.

Its sad to see you so far left that you have now decided on your own fate which is a doomed ideology.

Originally posted by Time-Immemorial
I think the only you have to face is the truth, and the truth is liberalism has failed, Obama has failed, and America is coming back around to is original values.

One, many of the values you insist are 'original' were never embraced by America. They're a projection of what you want, when the most prosperous times in the US's history had economics more in line with what the Democrats have pushed rather than your image.

Two, Obama cut unemployment in half, and *by far* outperformed George W. Bush... so, let's keep in mind who's party the failure is.

I disagree and you didn't prove me wrong here.

Try actually reading the Bible?

"It is the man who denies that Jesus is the Christ. Such a man is the antichrist--he denies the Father and the Son." -1 John 22

The antichrist openly denies that Jesus is Christ, Obama is an open Christian who believes Jesus is Christ. Can't be the antichrist- unless you're saying the Bible is wrong about the Anti, of course (again, the antichrist is not someone who's secret about it, but flat denies him).

Likewise, can't be the Pope or any other Christian.

Being openly against Jesus is practically the only descriptor of the anti-christ, so if you're saying anyone who doesn't fit that description is the antichrist, you're wrong.

This thread, and the remarks made by TI within it, can serve as an instant counter argument for any and all future "liberals are stupid" comments.

Reported for baiting trolling offtipic

Originally posted by Q99
One, many of the values you insist are 'original' were never embraced by America. They're a projection of what you want, when the most prosperous times in the US's history had economics more in line with what the Democrats have pushed rather than your image.

Two, Obama cut unemployment in half, and *by far* outperformed George W. Bush... so, let's keep in mind who's party the failure is.

Try actually reading the Bible?

"It is the man who denies that Jesus is the Christ. Such a man is the antichrist--he denies the Father and the Son." -1 John 22

The antichrist openly denies that Jesus is Christ, Obama is an open Christian who believes Jesus is Christ. Can't be the antichrist- unless you're saying the Bible is wrong about the Anti, of course (again, the antichrist is not someone who's secret about it, but flat denies him).

Likewise, can't be the Pope or any other Christian.

Being openly against Jesus is practically the only descriptor of the anti-christ, so if you're saying anyone who doesn't fit that description is the antichrist, you're wrong.

Im still trying to understand, you keep saying "I proved you wrong."

WHERE did YOU prove Me Wrong??

Originally posted by Time-Immemorial
He is anti-christ, don't know if he is the actual anti christ.

He does have people here calling him a god king though.

Originally posted by Time-Immemorial
Just like every republican president gets called Hitler..

I've had enough of your smart ass remarks.

Originally posted by Time-Immemorial
You have never proved me wrong on anything and you certainly didn't just prove me wrong on anything I just said.

Nice try dodger.

Which one of these statements I made did you prove me wrong about, answer that because I know you can't.