Originally posted by leonidasI'm curious in general, which opponents do you give Thor better odds than Jane?
yeah oddly i like jane's odds better than i do thor's. lol
Her showings against Mangog and Odin are quite ridiculous, tbh. But she kind of shit the bed against Gladiator.
She seems more....cerebral? Maybe? lol
Originally posted by MrMindThat's quite a hetero normative patriarchal bigoted vaginophobic view you have there.
lesbian sex doesn't make sense to mewhat is scissoring? smashing into each other's vaginas?
it just doesn't make sense
there's no plug one thing into another, how is it sex?
Bentley will set you straight soon.
I'm curious in general, which opponents do you give Thor better odds than Jane?Her showings against Mangog and Odin are quite ridiculous, tbh. But she kind of shit the bed against Gladiator.
She seems more....cerebral? Maybe? lol
lol i feel sort of the same. thor is all bash and smash, where i always had the sense jane COULD bash and smash but maybe it wouldn't be her first choice. she seemed more willing to let the hammer do a lot of the work for her--something thor would benefit from. i want to say i like thor better against the bruiser/brick types, but mangog is sort of the ultimate brick. hrm. now that i really think about it, i'd give jane better odds against most than i would thor. her command of the hammer was something thor never--and even as a skyfather--doesn't have. maybe thor is more likely to go for a kill against most, or is more likely to get brutal. if it calls for kill/be killed or really down and dirty, maybe there thor would be the better choice? mangog aside, at times, jane hesitates, i think. thor's single-mindedness (ie when he fought the thanosi AND mangog) can carry him a long way. i think he has the better damage soak as well. who would you take in a thor v jane all out battle?
Originally posted by Philosophía
That's quite a hetero normative patriarchal bigoted vaginophobic view you have there.Bentley will set you straight soon.
well not really
homosexual sex I understand, penis in a butt, straight to the point
lesbianism on the other hand...
lesbians are the opposite of gays
most gay men are physically attractive, almost none of the lesbians are
Originally posted by MrMind
lesbian sex doesn't make sense to mewhat is scissoring? smashing into each other's vaginas?
it just doesn't make sense
there's no plug one thing into another, how is it sex?
How should I put it? Certain heterosexual males masturbate without getting plowed with reckless abandon. Lesbian sex without plugs is like that
Originally posted by MrMindDisagree, I've seen plenty of hot lesbians on the internet. 😖hifty:
well not reallyhomosexual sex I understand, penis in a butt, straight to the point
lesbianism on the other hand...
lesbians are the opposite of gays
most gay men are physically attractive, almost none of the lesbians are
Originally posted by StyleTime
I'm not sure if Mr Mind is being humorous or not...You are aware fingers and mouths can also be used for sex, no?
PIV is only one way to do it, even among heterosexuals. It's all sex though.
I agree that Bentley needs to set you straight. 👆
would eating ass be constitute as sex is the question
the term sex should be about genital penetration
the rest is just pervertion