Paul Ryan's Budget Deal

Started by Q991 pages

Paul Ryan's Budget Deal

A bit late on this one, but- Paul Ryan's first budget deal was made earlier in the month.

Conservatives also lost on their most well-publicized demands that have dominated cable news. Language restricting Syrian and Iraqi refugee resettlement, defunding Planned Parenthood, or blocking President Obama’s executive actions on immigration will not be included.


Conservatives in the House Freedom Caucus, who have said at various points that they would not vote for a spending bill that funded either Planned Parenthood or Syrian and Iraqi refugee resettlement, are sticking to their word. Rep. Jim Jordan, chairman of the Freedom Caucus, does not expect his group to support to omnibus and doesn’t even expect that many rank-and-file Republicans to support it either. Rep. Tim Huelskamp, among the more vocal Freedom Caucus members, also predicted that a majority of Republicans would vote against the $1.1 trillion appropriations package that he’s calling the “Boehner legacy bill.”

In other words, Ryan will have to pass the omnibus with the same organic governing coalition of mostly Democrats and some Republicans that Boehner himself used to pass most necessary legislation. That’s a violation of the so-called Hastert rule in which a speaker has pledged to only call up legislation that has support of a majority of the majority party. Ryan assured conservatives that he would abide by this rule if they supported his bid. On his first big funding bill, Ryan will just … not follow the rule that he said he would follow.

This'll feed into the anti-establishment annoyance. Kick things off with overpromising and not keeping it isn't going to win fans... which is kinda a shame, because as one can see from the rest of the deal:

Republicans’ major “get” in the omnibus is a lift on the longtime ban of crude oil exports. That’s a big deal.

Lifting a real big 40-year ban is a fairly sizable thing. So Ryan did get a real compromise in exchange for passing the deal- as politics should work.

The Zadroga Act, a health care and compensation fund for 9/11 first responders and nearby workers, will be reauthorized until 2090, a hilarious year to settle on but one that effectively means permanent. Jon Stewart is an effective lobbyist.

It's still shocking to me that they tried to not-renew it, and I'm glad they got re-shamed into doing so. Still, not politically costly to agree.

Meanwhile, Republicans made all sorts of business tax breaks permanent without any new way to pay for them. This roughly $600 billion package of treats includes permanent extensions of the research-and-development tax credit and other depreciation credits. Democrats got extensions of certain tax credits from the 2009 stimulus. Both got to chip away at funding for the Affordable Care Act, by delaying implementation of the so-called Cadillac tax on high-cost health plans (this one was technically tacked onto the omnibus, not the tax package) and the medical device tax. This half of the deal will be a big, fat budget-buster, and it will pass with mostly Republican votes.

Another concession to the Republicans... kinda an odd one to go for.

TL😄R version:
The sides actually negotiated, none of the more over-the-top Republican promises that had been tossed around got implemented, and it required not following the Hastert rule to pass, but the Republicans did get an ok on oil exporting, and made some business tax breaks permanent on their side of the deal.

They sold our kids into slavery with this deal. Of course you are happy here.

Chucj Schumer gloating about the passage.

http://dailycaller.com/2015/12/18/rush-cant-say-omnibus-is-a-good-deal-when-chuck-schumer-is-gloating-video/

Originally posted by Time-Immemorial
They sold our kids into slavery with this deal.

Bit dramatic...

Plus kids make the best slaves and their wills are easily broken and bonus: they don't eat much.

😂

Originally posted by Time-Immemorial
They sold our kids into slavery with this deal. Of course you are happy here.

You are such a drama hog 🙂

I wonder what'd happen if you were forced to respond to the reality of issues rather than the hyperbole of them...

“If you would have told me this year that we’d be standing here celebrating the passage of an omnibus bill,” Schumer claimed. “I wouldn’t have believed it, but here we are.”

“And we got more than we asked for?” Limbaugh asked in response. “This bill is a great victory for the principles of the Democratic Party, and we’ve got Republican establishment types telling me that I am misreading this?”

This highlights something: What we actually have is what is known as a 'win-win,' both sides get stuff they want. Republicans are immediate distrustful because they don't believe in a win-win and they insist that if the Democrats are happy, it must somehow be bad for them.

It's a paranoid mindset. Accept your win!

You don't even have a clue what you are talking about.

Originally posted by Time-Immemorial
You don't even have a clue what you are talking about.

Care to actually explain your arguments? You like to complain about me making snide comments, but all you seem to do is come in, say you don't like something, and leave in a huff.

The Republicans got a lift of an oil export ban. How's that bad?

How's the budget deal- resorting, basically, the same form of budget we've had for years, mostly similar to the pre-Obama budget- 'selling our kids into slavery,' in your words.

Can you actually back up your arguments with why you think the things you say are bad are bad, or are they just drama without substance? A simple assumption that it must be bad without understanding what it is?