Pablo Hidalgo on Canon References:

Started by Selenial2 pages

Pablo Hidalgo on Canon References:

Not sure if anyone saw this, but:

"If canon story references X, which appeared in story Y, it does not follow that Y is also canon. Just X. Discuss. Somewhere else."

Bye bye Hero of Umbara. Bye bye Lehon meaning Revan's canon 😮‍💨

(link: https://twitter.com/pablohidalgo/status/681186814544105472 )

Who the hell here said Lehon means Revan is canon?

Originally posted by DarthAnt66
Who the hell said Lehon means Revan is canon?

TOR Forum fanboys, they're worse than you are, it's disgusting.

Then why post it here where everyone knows?

Originally posted by NewGuy01
Events that only took place during the Umbra arc of TCWAdventures were mentioned in DM: Shadow Conspiracy.

Hero of Umbara is 100% canon. 😎

Originally posted by NewGuy01
Nah, I'm talking Legends. The umbra arc of TCWA is mentioned in a C-Canon novel, thus it can no longer be ignored. 😈

I hope to this day Sas was joking, but there's been contention as to whether or not Umbara's canon for months now 😕

Also Chilled Monkey has argued that the whole Shatterpoint novel is Canon simply because the new canon references Depa came out of a coma.

So always good to keep these confirmations when addressing people who are completely in denial about how the new Canon works.

Originally posted by Selenial
I hope to this day Sas was joking, but there's been contention as to whether or not Umbara's canon for months now 😕

Uh, I'm pretty sure Pablo is talking about the Disney canon continuity, not Legends.

That being said, you specifically mentioned Revan.

It looks like you fired a bazooka out into open air, then walked away thinking you accomplished something.

Pretty embarrassing thread.

Originally posted by DarthAnt66
Uh, I'm pretty sure Pablo is talking about the Disney canon continuity, not Legends.

That being said, you specifically mentioned Revan.

It looks like you fired a bazooka out into open air, then walked away thinking you accomplished something.

Pretty embarrassing thread.

Because every mention of Revan must be a pot-shot towards you, right? 🙄

I forgot you feel like you own everything to do with that character.

I didn't even mention me. 😮‍💨

It looks like you're now the one associating Revan with myself. Good job.

You came in acting like you crumbled the Revan brigade when no one here even thought that way.

You tried to change it to the Hero of Umbara but the quote doesn't even prove that either.

Thus, the thread is a failure. Move along, move along.

Originally posted by DarthAnt66
Who the hell here said Lehon means Revan is canon?

*cough*samegoesformalachor*cough*

I never seriously said Revan is canon because of the Malachor reference. 😉

Just that it's a subtle throwback / reference to Revan and the Mandalorian Wars, which is true.

That doesn't make it canonical though.

Malachor's also referenced in TCW

Not even, tbh. Honestly the VD makes it sound like it's a reference to when the Sith still inhabited the planet, tbh.

Concession accepted. 😉

Re: Pablo Hidalgo on Canon References:

Originally posted by Selenial
Bye bye Hero of Umbara. Bye bye Lehon meaning Revan's canon 😮‍💨

lmfao at Selenial changing what she originally said to save face.

It doesn't say edit, and you already posted. Therefore she changed nothing.

The original made absolutely no reference to Umbara, that I recall.

Re: Re: Pablo Hidalgo on Canon References:

Originally posted by DarthAnt66
lmfao at Selenial changing what she originally said to save face.

Kek, Hero of Umbara was there since the start, the only edit made was to add the link in and that was done 10 seconds after the original post 🙄

Or did your eyes simply jump to the word Revan and ignore what the rest of the post said?

No matter what the truth is, the evidence doesn't support you, Ant. Get ready for Anna Kendrick gifs.