Originally posted by DarkSaint85
Does Batman get his suit/gadgets?
Without his suit and gadgets, Bruce is a very stealthy human being who can be considered to be as stealthy as a top non-mystical ninja.
With his suit and gadgets, Bruce has snuck up to the likes of Superman (where not even his heartbeat could be heard), or sneaking up on some White Martians (bypassing not even enhanced senses but even TP).
Without his suit and gadgets, Bruce competes well with Wolverine since they are both highly trained and adept individuals. Who is better is open to argument however, and someone saying Bruce would win and another saying Logan would win are both correct in my opinion. Both individuals are very stealthy.
With his suit and gadgets, this is not a competition. Batman in his suit and gadgets trying to be stealthy is beyond Logan's ability, since now you have someone who is naturally stealthy but now augmented by technology that can make him invisible to Kryptonian and Martian senses.
Originally posted by spetznaz
Without his suit and gadgets, Bruce is a very stealthy human being who can be considered to be as stealthy as a top non-mystical ninja.With his suit and gadgets, Bruce has snuck up to the likes of Superman (where not even his heartbeat could be heard), or sneaking up on some White Martians (bypassing not even enhanced senses but even TP).
Without his suit and gadgets, Bruce competes well with Wolverine since they are both highly trained and adept individuals. Who is better is open to argument however.
With his suit and gadgets, this is not a competition.
I ask, because in another thread, golem (the OP) has argued that in threads involving Thor, Mjolnir should not be allowed.
Therefore, in threads involving Batman, would OP allow his suit/gadgets?
Originally posted by wuleecat
Enemy of the State. Wolverine snuck into the Baxter building and proceeded to kick the crap out of the FF.Just saying-- he's no Batman at stealth-stuff, but he's definitely no slouch.
That wasn't the first time he did it.
Also, in a What if, he did the same to Black Panther's security systems.
Originally posted by DarkSaint85
I ask, because in another thread, golem (the OP) has argued that in threads involving Thor, Mjolnir should not be allowed.Therefore, in threads involving Batman, would OP allow his suit/gadgets?
Oh, that's interesting. Why should Mjolnir not be allowed in Thor threads? That is part of his standard equipment, is it not? That is very surprising. What's next ...not allowing Tony Stark to be wearing his suits of armor since they give him an advantage, in which case without armor all we have is a rich chap with a former alcoholic problem.
As for Batman ...without his suit, Bruce is an extremely well-trained hand to hand combatant (generally at Richard Dragon level) and an astutely intelligent individual (a medley of Mr Terrific, Dr Mid Nite and the Question) in science, detective work and a plethora of other areas. But he would NOT be Batman.
Hopefully next we'll not see people asking for Stark to battle without his suit, or Banner to not turn into the Hulk, or Reed to forego his heightened intelligence, or better yet, for Reed to battle while absolutely drunk on cheap rum ...after all, all those factors give them immense advantages.
I am very surprised a poster said that Thor shouldn't have his hammer, when it is standard equipment. If that's the case, and it wasn't for a one off scenario but rather something the poster felt should ALWAYS be the case, then it is very surprising.
Originally posted by spetznaz
Oh, that's interesting. Why should Mjolnir not be allowed in Thor threads? That is part of his standard equipment, is it not? That is very surprising. What's next ...not allowing Tony Stark to be wearing his suits of armor since they give him an advantage, in which case without armor all we have is a rich chap with a former alcoholic problem.As for Batman ...without his suit, Bruce is an extremely well-trained hand to hand combatant (generally at Richard Dragon level) and an astutely intelligent individual (a medley of Mr Terrific, Dr Mid Nite and the Question) in science, detective work and a plethora of other areas. But he would NOT be Batman.
Hopefully next we'll not see people asking for Stark to battle without his suit, or Banner to not turn into the Hulk, or Reed to forego his heightened intelligence, or better yet, for Reed to battle while absolutely drunk on cheap rum ...after all, all those factors give them immense advantages.
I am very surprised a poster said that Thor shouldn't have his hammer, when it is standard equipment. If that's the case, and it wasn't for a one off scenario but rather something the poster felt should ALWAYS be the case, then it is very surprising.
👆
http://www.killermovies.com/forums/f77/t621295.html
As for this thread, DCU Bats absolutely stomps here.
His most insane feat was sneaking past Zauriel, Superman, WW, GA, AND the Spectre (plus defences), and leaving a present in plain sight behind them:
http://i289.photobucket.com/albums/ll223/darknight2k/Stealth/spectre24-batmagicstealth6.jpg:
http://i289.photobucket.com/albums/ll223/darknight2k/Stealth/spectre24-batmagicstealth7.jpg
DCnU Bats also has some pretty good feats which make him stealthier than Wolvy.
Originally posted by DarkSaint85
I ask, because in another thread, golem (the OP) has argued that in threads involving Thor, Mjolnir should not be allowed.Therefore, in threads involving Batman, would OP allow his suit/gadgets?
😕 Was he talking in general, or for strength comparison? If it was the later, at least that would make sense.
