Originally posted by Robtard
As has been noted before: do you think it's more plausible there's some huge conspiracy involving 60+ people spanning decades to frame Cosby as a rapist, or that one famous guy is a rapist.
I think the definition of rape is very different now compared to what it was then.
If you get fall over drunk and high and have sex now, you are a rapist, and so is she. Doesn't matter if you both "consented" while under the influence.
Back in the 1960's, this is just something everyone did without thinking about it. Movies were made about drunken drugged out sex orgies.
Do I think Bill Cosby did that shite? Absolutely!
Do I think he forced himself on people?
That I'm less sure about, but it wouldn't surprise me. Groping, probably. Sadly, that too was very common back in the day.
No, I'm not really saying there's a conspiracy to frame him. What I AM saying is Bill Cosby is a dirty old man who pissed off other dirty old men, and they took all that dirt he covered himself in and tried to choke him in it.
I suspect the elite world is like this. Every one is dirty, everyone knows who did what, and there's an informal agreement to look the other way because they're all dirty. Unless you piss the wrong people off. Then your immunity is revoked, and you face the music.
So why wouldn't Cosby just throw it back at them, if they're all dirty? Well, they did probably murder Epstein, who had dirt on EVERYONE. So that would be a reason.
Prison beats being offered up to a contract killer.