Originally posted by Time-Immemorial
He will be blocked in federal court just like his executive amnesty was, if the court does not block him, congress will, if they don't, the people will.
Congress does something to OPPOSE Obama's illegal actions?
Since when?
I thought their main reaction was to drop trou bend over and say please sir may we have another.
*goes off to hide guns where Obama's SocioNazis won't find em*
Originally posted by Tattoos N ScarsThis is a failed analogy. Guns and drugs are not the same thing. Drugs are much easier and cheaper to produce than a gun.
If he wants to control semi auto's, fine. He needs to leave my hunting rifles and shotguns alone though. It's a waste of time though. Regulating guns will be like the war on drugs. People still gonna get their hands on them.
Originally posted by Tattoos N ScarsThey are also harder to sneak in, harder to conceal, and harder to transport than drugs. There is also the issue of ammunition and supplying it.
Illegal arms deals is a big business. You can sneak damn near anything into this country. They don't have to be made here.
Yes there are international arms rings but they generally flourish in more poverty stricken countries where there are less rules and regulations like Africa or the former Soviet Union countries.
It's not like the UK has an influx of firearms after they were banned.
I'm not saying guns couldn't make it into the country but trying to pretend that banning guns will end up with the same effect as banning drugs is a improper analogy in this context. Banning Guns =/= the same problems as banning Drugs.
Originally posted by Time-ImmemorialDo you really believe illegal drugs are not easier to obtain, transport, make, secure than illegal firearms would be?
Don't mind new jack, he's an Internet sharpshooter with a big ego who's apparently never wrong about anything.