Originally posted by NewGuy01
This troll is seasoned
How am I trolling? I'm taking a pretty quantifiable, documented feat and comparing it against the observable performances of characters in the films. It's perfectly legitimate analysis of the evidence.
Of course, it's funny because it leads to intuitively ridiculous conclusions, but you can't pre-define certain conclusions to be invalid to judge the validity of the reasoning; you have to judge the validity of the conclusions based on the validity of the logic and soundness of the premises.