Originally posted by Time-Immemorial
Double standard.Your saying the republican is guilty but the democrat is innocent until proven guilty.
So the democrat gets equal justice under law as you see it, but the republican does not.
The Democrat had something mildly improbable of a sort that happens daily, and she was not even personally involved in any of the flips, the flipping was done by unrelated people, and they had no significant effect on the outcome.
The Republican had people actively lying, blatantly, and could've had a noticeable effect on the outcome.
One of these things is not like the other.
May I remind everyone, 4 failed states in the middle east because of her, none of which has anything to go with Bush or Iraq. So don't even try your usual blame bush game.Libya-Failed
Somolia-Failed
Yemen-Failed
Syria-Failed
Did you just blame Hillary Clinton for causing the Arab spring *and* for causing failed states before she took office? That's really dishonest ^^
Libya- Something of a lose-lose. The leader had turned on many people, and we did almost certainly stop a slaughter, but once Gaddafi acted, a stable state was very unlikely.
Somalia- Civil War began in '91. Ended in '06. Has been slowly recovering since, better when Hillary left her position than when she started, though not due to her actions.
Yemen- Long history of conflict, with uprisings in the 90s, 00s, etc., and not tied to US actions. Hillary not involved in any major moves there.
Syria- Failed, the US was not involved in the failure/certainly didn't cause it. The most you could say is we could've done more... and Hillary advocated doing more.