This Walgreens employee wasn't as lucky.
Walgreens employee acted in self defense against an armed robbery, after they approached him. No policy against firearms, and apparently even law enforcement agrees they would reacted in the same manner.
However, as an "at will" employee, Walgreens doesn't really need to justify firing him, and the courts ruled the second amendment doesn't apply to private employers.
Originally posted by cdtm
This Walgreens employee wasn't as lucky.Walgreens employee acted in self defense against an armed robbery, after they approached him. No policy against firearms, and apparently even law enforcement agrees they would reacted in the same manner.
However, as an "at will" employee, Walgreens doesn't really need to justify firing him, and the courts ruled the second amendment doesn't apply to private employers.
So a policy by General Motors is now somehow symbolic of the viewpoint of all liberal democrats? Massive generalization right there, not to mention this thread was clearly made for the sole purpose to take potshots at the left wing even though, as stated, this was a company policy that had nothing to do with politics. Funny how many smear threads like this keep popping up, and that it seems to be right wingers who keep creating them. Hmm....
Originally posted by Lestov16
So a policy by General Motors is now somehow symbolic of the viewpoint of all liberal democrats? Massive generalization right there, not to mention this thread was clearly made for the sole purpose to take potshots at the left wing even though, as stated, this was a company policy that had nothing to do with politics. Funny how many smear threads like this keep popping up, and that it seems to be right wingers who keep creating them. Hmm....
Originally posted by Robtard
Good for that guy, he also seems like a responsible gun owner.But if a company has a "no gun policy" for their employees or certain employees/jobs, should they not enforce it?
We have a policy saying there should be no illegals here. We should enforce that too, right? Actually wait no it's actually a law, so it's a step up from mere policy.
I'm glad to hear you support deporting all illegals.
Originally posted by Surtur
We have a policy saying there should be no illegals here. We should enforce that too, right? Actually wait no it's actually a law, so it's a step up from mere policy.I'm glad to hear you support deporting all illegals.
Yeah that was kinda strange, if policy is policy then well..shit, policy is policy. Whether it's for a job or for ambulance services. Unless nobody in the history of the US has ever been charged for ambulance services.
Oh wait, I have, a few years ago, when I had to be taken to the hospital due to having seizures. Hmm. Well hey, I'm not from the same state the kid is so as long as nobody in the history of that state has ever been sent a bill for paramedic services then..yep, the bill should of not been sent.
Originally posted by Surtur
Yeah that was kinda strange, if policy is policy then well..shit, policy is policy. Whether it's for a job or for ambulance services. Unless nobody in the history of the US has ever been charged for ambulance services.Oh wait, I have, a few years ago, when I had to be taken to the hospital due to having seizures. Hmm. Well hey, I'm not from the same state the kid is so as long as nobody in the history of that state has ever been sent a bill for paramedic services then..yep, the bill should of not been sent.