Washington man strips nude in girls locker room, justifies it with new law

Originally posted by Surtur
Except this is bunk. Show me a single quote of anyone saying men raping boys was not a concern to them. Go on, I'll wait. Pointing out a fact like straights out number gays sure as hell doesn't say it.

I even said I don't think grown ass men should be able to get naked in front of kids. So no, it's not about not caring about gay rape. But the thing is..we didn't just recently have them enact a law saying men and boys can share locker rooms. You can't say the same for this transgender stuff, which was recent, which is why people are talking about it.

So why are important details like "this was just a recent law" being left out when it comes to why people aren't talking as much about gay rape?

Like you've said interage bathrooms have existed for a long time and yet there is no current push to really get rid of them.

But all of a sudden this concern rises on this topic. It just seems out of place. I think the point that is being made as well is that the world hasn't fallen apart because men and boys share showers yet for some reason grown men and underage girls are becoming a rallying cry for this movement. People are acting like culture itself is breaking apart. It's just comes off as we need an excuse so here is the first one we think will stick.

You yourself even said most men that would use this law would use it for its true purpose which is to feel secure in a bathroom that they identify with their true gender.

Originally posted by Time-Immemorial
Interesting you dismiss anything anyone says on the other side and just try to flip around it.

Originally posted by Robtard
Adam's comment was specifically about the city of SF.

It was actually Artificial Glory's claim that in general US population it's like 5-10% of GLB people.

Then Adam gave an example of SF.

Originally posted by Robtard
Oh boy

Thats you usual comment when faced with the facts, just accept you will take any opposite side against anyone purely on a ideological difference when it comes to identity politics.

Originally posted by Stigma
True.

It was actually Artificial Glory's claim that in general US population it's like 5-10% of GLB people.

Then Adam gave an example of SF.

eg Look at Ted Cruz, clearly a self-loathing homosexual. Would be ever come out? I don't think so.

Originally posted by Surtur
It wouldn't surprise me if the 1/5 thing was true for San Francisco. But then we are talking about the country as a whole, not a specific city known for it's large gay population.

Just like there is a section of Chicago called "Boys Town" where, you guessed it, a lot of gays live. So if you went there you'd be running into a lot of gays, but it wouldn't suddenly change the fact about the overall number of homosexuals in the country.

I also just flat out do not think men and boys should be able to shower together. Nor should adult females and little girls.

Also I don't think the gays is less argument really works because it once again assumes child molesters for females greatly outnumber the number of male child molesters for boys. I would like to see some actual data to support this.

Originally posted by Robtard
AG's claim isn't all that crazy, considering the world-wide stigma against homosexuality

Originally posted by Robtard
and people being afraid or self-loathing to come out eg Look at Ted Cruz, clearly a self-loathing homosexual. Would be ever come out? I don't think so.

Originally posted by Time-Immemorial
Thats you usual comment when faced with the facts, just accept you will take any opposite side against anyone purely on a ideological difference when it comes to identity politics.

You really need to stop demonizing me, it's not healthy.

I'm not. Im stating the facts, you take the opposite side on anything, I really don't believe you believe half the stuff you write, you mainly just play devils advocate and try to punch holes in peoples arguments for pure enjoyment. Look at who you are defending here, some thug acting like a class A retard.

Originally posted by Stigma
I see what you did there. 😎

LOL

It wasn't a gag. Homosexuality is still a crime in some countries. Is it really hard to believe that there are really 2-4 times the amount of homosexuals in the world, but they're not open about it?

Originally posted by Time-Immemorial
I'm not. Im stating the facts, you take the opposite side on anything, I really don't believe you believe half the stuff you write, you mainly just play devils advocate and try to punch holes in peoples arguments for pure enjoyment. Look at who you are defending here, some thug acting like a class A retard.

Honestly, I have no idea what point you're on now. Who exactly am I defending here do you imagine? Thug?

Originally posted by Robtard
Are you also not aware that Trump and Cruz are the top two candidates on the Republican platform, having the largest groups of supporters? You should really know this.

You call this a solid argument rob?

That was just stating a fact, you should really move beyond it. That's so page 2 or something

Originally posted by Robtard
It wasn't a gag. Homosexuality is still a crime in some countries. Is it really hard to believe that there are really 2-4 times the amount of homosexuals in the world, but they're not open about it?

If we narrow it down to the West I kinda dount that people answering a survey live in fear of social stigma. So I'd say these numbers are pretty exact.

I agree that in the coutnries that have death penalty for homosexualtiy there will be like close to zero open homosexuals, as the terror will rule.

I am especially concerned about LGBT rghts in hardcore Muslim countries.

Originally posted by Robtard
That was just stating a fact, you should really move beyond it. That's so page 2 or something

You didn't state a fact, you didn't back that claim up, you made a wild assumption.

Originally posted by Stigma
Oh, you mean in the world. Not sure.

If we narrow it down to the West I kinda dount that people answering a survey live in fear of social stigma. So I'd say these numbers are pretty exact.

I agree that in the coutnries that have death penalty for homosexualtiy there will be like close to zero open homosexuals, as the terror will rule.

I am especially concerned about LGBT rghts in hardcore Muslim countries.

Originally posted by Time-Immemorial
You didn't state a fact, you didn't back that claim up, you made a wild assumption.

HYG:
http://www.realclearpolitics.com/epolls/2016/president/us/2016_republican_presidential_nomination-3823.html

Trump 33.8
Cruz 21.0

But that/this was off topic, so we should just move on

Originally posted by Robtard
Finally, said something not insane. There's hope for Poland.

That's kinda racist of you, but I let it pass 😛

Originally posted by Robtard
HYG:
http://www.realclearpolitics.com/epolls/2016/president/us/2016_republican_presidential_nomination-3823.html

Why is his comments insane up until this point, but Germany's Bartdocks are not?

Originally posted by Time-Immemorial
Why is his comments insane up until this point, but Germany's Bartdocks are not?

B42 made one post in here and it was to point out correct mathematics. Why would I find correct maths insane?