Originally posted by eThneoLgrRnae
I am certainly not one of those "all Jews are the devil!" idiots. I'm not the least bit anti-semitic.
Ehhh! We agree again on something. So rare that we agree.
Yes, I don't support the Jew hate.
Jews are overrepresented in the news/media, Hollywood, and law because it's part of their culture to get an education. Also, Backfire (I believe) pointed out that back in the day, Jews needed a profession so back in the early 1900s, they got really big into movies. And it just became dynastic from there. Similar to the Rockefellers with Big Oil and real estate. It was just a family thing. It just so happens that news and Hollywood really blew up so it appears like there's some sort of evil conspiracy for Jews to rule the world.
Just not true.
Look at Murdoch's media empire. He specifically slammed "jewish owned media."
https://www.cnn.com/2012/11/19/opinion/kurtz-murdoch-tweets/index.html
So, clearly, it's just an opportunity and religion thing. There's really not secret Jew club to rule the world.
Originally posted by dadudemon
Ehhh! We agree again on something. So rare that we agree.Yes, I don't support the Jew hate.
Jews are overrepresented in the news/media, Hollywood, and law because it's part of their culture to get an education. Also, Backfire (I believe) pointed out that back in the day, Jews needed a profession so back in the early 1900s, they got really big into movies. And it just became dynastic from there. Similar to the Rockefellers with Big Oil and real estate. It was just a family thing. It just so happens that news and Hollywood really blew up so it appears like there's some sort of evil conspiracy for Jews to rule the world.
Just not true.
Look at Murdoch's media empire. He specifically slammed "jewish owned media."
https://www.cnn.com/2012/11/19/opinion/kurtz-murdoch-tweets/index.html
So, clearly, it's just an opportunity and religion thing. There's really not secret Jew club to rule the world.
I dunno man, "We just work harder" isn't an acceptable reason in any other example of overrepresented demographics.
"Disparate impacts" and all that.
Originally posted by dadudemon
Ehhh! We agree again on something. So rare that we agree.Yes, I don't support the Jew hate.
Jews are overrepresented in the news/media, Hollywood, and law because it's part of their culture to get an education. Also, Backfire (I believe) pointed out that back in the day, Jews needed a profession so back in the early 1900s, they got really big into movies. And it just became dynastic from there. Similar to the Rockefellers with Big Oil and real estate. It was just a family thing. It just so happens that news and Hollywood really blew up so it appears like there's some sort of evil conspiracy for Jews to rule the world.
Just not true.
Look at Murdoch's media empire. He specifically slammed "jewish owned media."
https://www.cnn.com/2012/11/19/opinion/kurtz-murdoch-tweets/index.html
So, clearly, it's just an opportunity and religion thing. There's really not secret Jew club to rule the world.
Well, to be clear, I do believe that there are a group of elites who want to rule the world (and depopulate it) but they are Luciferians. Some of them are jews, yes, but that has nothing to do with it.
I don't think there is an inherent link between Judaism and Satanism/Luciferianism. Do I believe that there are some bad jewish people? Absolutely. I won't name names though *coughgeorgesoroscough*.
But there are also some bad people who call themselves "Christian" and are white people. There are also bad people of every other "race" and religion.
I don't think "Jew = bad". There are plenty of jewish people I like: Ben Shapiro, Laura Loomer, etc..
...and of course the greatest Jew of them all: Jesus Christ.
Originally posted by eThneoLgrRnaetinfoilhatastic 👆
Well, to be clear, I do believe that there are a group of elites who want to rule the world (and depopulate it) but they are Luciferians. Some of them are jews, yes, but that has nothing to do with it.I don't think there is an inherent link between Judaism and Satanism/Luciferianism. Do I believe that there are some bad jewish people? Absolutely. I won't name names though *coughgeorgesoroscough*. But there are also some bad people who call themselves "Christian" and are white people. There are also bad people of every other "race".
I don't think "Jew = bad". There are plenty of jewish people I like: Ben Shapiro, Laura Loomer, etc..
durwank
Originally posted by cdtm
I dunno man, "We just work harder" isn't an acceptable reason in any other example of overrepresented demographics."Disparate impacts" and all that.
That's not true because that's not how statistics work on normal distributions.
Hear me out before you get mad at me.
Women have IQs more clustered at the 50th percentile than men. Men are flatter on the bell curve. It's why there appears to be many more highly intelligent men than women: the flattening also means you'll see a disproportionate number of really dumb men and really smart men at the extremes on the normal distribution for IQ.
Here's a common image that shows this normal distribution:
Evolutionary Scientists do have a theory as to why women would be more tightly clustered towards the 50th percentile (meaning, their general intelligence is more homogeneous than male intelligence): standardization, normalcy, and expected behavior are better environments for pregnancy and raising children. Nature selected for a more homogeneous female human than male (males variability may be like the RNG in machine learning - natures way of trying to find the optimal male human). We were hunters and gatherers before we assembled into giant "tribes" known as cities.
Just like the human sexes having different IQ normal distributions, the same is also true when you compare high-achieving groups like Mormons and Jews except in this case, their "50th percentile" might be the 60th percentile when compared to the population average.
Meaning, their median education is much higher than the median education of the population average. Because of how normal distributions work, that means it would appear to have a skew at the higher ends. That also means you'd have far far more Jews at the higher ends of educational attainment compared to the population average. A flattened bell curve means those numbers are lower in the "middle" but higher in the end.
And it takes generations to see this effect. Italian immigrants went from the poorest and least educated in the early 1900s to significantly better than the average American by the mid-1950s. That took generations.
Jews did not build up their massive corporate empires overnight. It took generations. And it is part of their beliefs to get an education and achieve success.
Summary and the too long didn't read:
Jews are the most educated religious group in the world.
https://www.pewforum.org/2016/12/13/religion-and-education-around-the-world/
Originally posted by dadudemon
That's not true because that's not how statistics work on normal distributions.Hear me out before you get mad at me.
Women have IQs more clustered at the 50th percentile than men. Men are flatter on the bell curve. It's why there appears to be many more highly intelligent men than women: the flattening also means you'll see a disproportionate number of really dumb men and really smart men at the extremes on the normal distribution for IQ.
Here's a common image that shows this normal distribution:
Evolutionary Scientists do have a theory as to why women would be more tightly clustered towards the 50th percentile (meaning, their general intelligence is more homogeneous than male intelligence): standardization, normalcy, and expected behavior are better environments for pregnancy and raising children. Nature selected for a more homogenous female among humans. We were hunters and gatherers before we assembled into giant "tribes" known as cities.
Just like the human sexes having different IQ normal distributions, the same is also true when you compare high-achieving groups like Mormons and Jews except in this case, their "50th percentile" might be the 60th percentile when compared to the population average.
Meaning, their median education is much higher than the median education of the population average. Because of how normal distributions work, that means it would appear to have a skew at the higher ends. That also means you'd have far far more Jews at the higher ends of educational attainment compared to the population average. A flattened bell curve means those numbers are lower in the "middle" but higher in the end.
And it takes generations to see this effect. Italian immigrants went from the poorest and least educated in the early 1900s to significantly better than the average American by the mid-1950s. That took generations.
Jews did not build up their massive corporate empires overnight. It took generations. And it is part of their beliefs to get an education and achieve success.
Summary and the too long didn't read:
Jews are the most educated religious group in the world.
https://www.pewforum.org/2016/12/13/religion-and-education-around-the-world/
Gonna need to digest this before I form an opinion.
I never did agree with "Disparate impact" logic in a general sense, because its based on assumption,. is inherently unfalsifiable, and seems dogmatic.
Originally posted by cdtm
Gonna need to digest this before I form an opinion.I never did agree with "Disparate impact" logic in a general sense, because its based on assumption,. is inherently unfalsifiable, and seems dogmatic.
Take your time digesting this info. It's a lot to take in. Statistics not an easy topic and it's frustratingly counter-intuitive at times.
That data finally "sank in" when I saw a simulation of how money can concentrate into one particular group's hands with only a slight advantage, over time.
When you can visualize what happens to the money, over time, then you really understand what's going on. Since Jews are equipped with the highest educational attainment in the world, they have access to the "latest and greatest" knowledge. So they will be over-represented in industry that they choose. I can see this first hand among Mormons: we are over-represented as doctors, lawyers, and engineers. Because it is literally in our teachings to seek after the knowledge of the universe as it helps us know the mind of God which is a holy pursuit. I bet you devout Mormons have the highest educational attainment of any religious group in the world even when controlling for piety among other religions and atheism. It's that big of a deal in "Mormon church." And my Jewish palls report a similar push to get higher education.
Maaaaan, now you're making me wish I would go talk to my old friends. The best laughs I had growing up was when we'd make fun of each other's religions. It's kind of like the "want to know how I know you're gay?" game but it's zingers for Jews and Mormons, instead. 🙂
Originally posted by Silent Master
BLM
But who is that? Are there specific people you want to speak out against racism in the BLM movement? I'm trying to take you in good faith here, and that you really think that they could disavow racist elements somehow, I'd just like to know how they could do that to your satisfaction?