Captain America vs. Bolg

Originally posted by KuRuPT Thanosi
Lawd... This moron can't get a single thing straight. HOLY SHIT. Clownshoes 5000, I challenged you to a battlezone BEFORE you ever challenged me. Do you wanna see who mentions doing a battlezone first? Do I need to quote the first person to say so? I blatantly and opening suggested.. begged... for a BZ in multiple posts before you even thought about issuing a challenge I wasn't even talking about. That was your pussy move, but your pussy move or failure to use logic isn't my problem you didn't know what I meant by skill. Don't try and conflate your moronic behavior with somehow you challenging me first. In that same thread I challenged Quan before he ever issued a challenge to me. One day you'll get something right. Then again, likely not. Let me guess, you'll bs and lie and say you brought up a BZ first right, THEN I'll find the first post on it and it will be mine..... you'll go.. Oh yeah, I forgot. AMITRITE LOL

Originally posted by quanchi112
The best part is we challenged him claims he made. When we issue challenges he makes new claims up for us because he doesn't have the balls to actually battlezone what he made the claim about.

Very telling.

Are you still mad you're the resident joke that you feel you're proving something here? I challenged you first. You and Froth ineptitude with the English language isn't my bad. I opening challenged you and Froth on who was more skilled in combat. You and Froth both said Cap was more skilled in combat. I challenged said notion, and no amount of you being a pansy will ever change that. I challenged you, you pussied out. Simple. Funny thing is, you'd also likely lose this BZ to. Which is why it makes it so funny you think I'm scared to do it lol. It's like the Albus vs. Voldemort thread... You left the argument with Juggs for 6 months without responding to his post. I then pointed out, and you agreed, that in the past you had made the claim that... If you don't respond to my argument that means you concede. There are literally dozens of posts from you saying that very thing. Thus by YOUR standards you concede the argument to Juggs

here, you seem to think just because there is opposing views that means a BZ is required. Should I find 100... probably 200 threads where you didn't issue a BZ challenge, even though multiple people disagreed with your stance? I could find that many theads. Shoud I? Just because there is a differing opinion doesn't mean anything is required.. even by YOUR standards. As if that isn't enough, taking that idiocy to it's progression, we'd still be left with me challenging Quan first, and he by his own standards backed down. You bad at this. You make Froth look like a respectable poster.. sometimes when he's not in Quan mode

Originally posted by quanchi112
You wanted us to represent stances we never made while,you refuse them with stances you did make. You're gutless. You've been called out.

BS LOL. Pathetic. The question was ALWAYS about skill. ALWAYS. Froth would even agree. Just because you two can't figure out what skilled in combat means isn't my problem.

Originally posted by KuRuPT Thanosi
Are you still mad you're the resident joke that you feel you're proving something here? I challenged you first. You and Froth ineptitude with the English language isn't my bad. I opening challenged you and Froth on who was more skilled in combat. You and Froth both said Cap was more skilled in combat. I challenged said notion, and no amount of you being a pansy will ever change that. I challenged you, you pussied out. Simple. Funny thing is, you'd also likely lose this BZ to. Which is why it makes it so funny you think I'm scared to do it lol. It's like the Albus vs. Voldemort thread... You left the argument with Juggs for 6 months without responding to his post. I then pointed out, and you agreed, that in the past you had made the claim that... If you don't respond to my argument that means you concede. There are literally dozens of posts from you saying that very thing. Thus by YOUR standards you concede the argument to Juggs

here, you seem to think just because there is opposing views that means a BZ is required. Should I find 100... probably 200 threads where you didn't issue a BZ challenge, even though multiple people disagreed with your stance? I could find that many theads. Shoud I? Just because there is a differing opinion doesn't mean anything is required.. even by YOUR standards. As if that isn't enough, taking that idiocy to it's progression, we'd still be left with me challenging Quan first, and he by his own standards backed down. You bad at this. You make Froth look like a respectable poster.. sometimes when he's not in Quan mode

Originally posted by KuRuPT Thanosi
BS LOL. Pathetic. The question was ALWAYS about skill. ALWAYS. Froth would even agree. Just because you two can't figure out what skilled in combat means isn't my problem.

Originally posted by FrothByte
Yeah, the problem was you challenged me to a BZ regarding a topic I never argued against you with.

Even if you actually think that's true, even by your idiocy standards, then that would mean YOU challenged me to something I was never talking about. Again, in the other thread you admitted I wasn't just talking about Acrobatics. Whatever that misunderstanding was, I certainly wasn't doing a BZ on acrobatics. You said fine. Thus, you challenged me to something I wasn't arguing about right?

Also, it was also about skill in combat, I made that clear in every seen post where I correct said misunderstanding. Yet YOU kept repeating Acrobatics(knowing that wasn't what I was saying as I had corrected it already like 5 times... while also leaving out parts of the sentence lol.) over and over. Yet that isn't a lame attempt at a challenge? Really? LOL Right Bud, you disputed Legolas was more skilled in combat, I was always talking about skill in combat. I'm still talking about it. Let me guess, I'll need to quote this stuff huh?

Originally posted by KuRuPT Thanosi
Even if you actually think that's true, even by your idiocy standards, then that would mean YOU challenged me to something I was never talking about. Again, in the other thread you admitted I wasn't just talking about Acrobatics. Whatever that misunderstanding was, I certainly wasn't doing a BZ on acrobatics. You said fine. Thus, you challenged me to something I wasn't arguing about right?

Also, it was also about skill in combat, I made that clear in every seen post where I correct said misunderstanding. Yet YOU kept repeating Acrobatics(knowing that wasn't what I was saying as I had corrected it already like 5 times... while also leaving out parts of the sentence lol.) over and over. Yet that isn't a lame attempt at a challenge? Really? LOL Right Bud, you disputed Legolas was more skilled in combat, I was always talking about skill in combat. I'm still talking about it. Let me guess, I'll need to quote this stuff huh?

Originally posted by quanchi112
You made a stance that Bolg clearly wouldn't get stomped. I called you out. You backed down. Everyone saw you backdown to froth. You're done here, backdown kid.

So you'd like me to find posts where you said you weren't interested in doing that BZ? Even though in the thread you were taking an opposing stance? Temp ban bet? Has this happened on multiple occasions is the question... Thus, you've backed down each and every time that happens? Saying you don't feel like it, or it doesn't interest you isn't a valid excuse by YOUR standards. What your saying here is, if you have an opposing view, and get challenged.. you must accept or you're backing down? Wanna make the bet?

So everyone agrees? Cap wins 10/10

Originally posted by KuRuPT Thanosi
So you'd like me to find posts where you said you weren't interested in doing that BZ? Even though in the thread you were taking an opposing stance? Temp ban bet? Has this happened on multiple occasions is the question... Thus, you've backed down each and every time that happens? Saying you don't feel like it, or it doesn't interest you isn't a valid excuse by YOUR standards. What your saying here is, if you have an opposing view, and get challenged.. you must accept or you're backing down? Wanna make the bet?

You made a stance and I said I'd prove it via battlezone. You backed down. You've never done one. You're all talk. You're a woman.

Originally posted by Silent Master
So everyone agrees? Cap wins 10/10

actually it's 1,000,000,000/10

Keep running, Kt.

Cap wins comfortably

Originally posted by TheVaultDweller
Cap wins comfortably

Yes, indeed. Cap wins while sitting on a lounger, sipping a mojito in front of a pool.

Cap reclines in the lounger right after beating Bolg to death with it. 😛

Originally posted by TheVaultDweller
Cap reclines in the lounger right after beating Bolg to death with it. 😛

Or he uses Bolg to beat the lounger into submission. Make the sitting more comfy.

Kt has been humiliated once again. Stomp it is just like when he asks a girl out they always stomp his feelings into submission.

Originally posted by quanchi112
That didn't have anything to do with me. You backed down to froth. I called it before you even did.

You made a stance and I said I'd prove it via battlezone. You backed down. You've never done one. You're all talk. You're a woman.

Nice avoidance.... AGAIN... Could I find multiple threads where you've taken an opposing view... somebody has called you out on a BZ and you declined. Has this happened or not? Temp ban bet?

Originally posted by KuRuPT Thanosi
Nice avoidance.... AGAIN... Could I find multiple threads where you've taken an opposing view... somebody has called you out on a BZ and you declined. Has this happened or not? Temp ban bet?

So you admit you have backed down then? Just because you've done a BZ before.. doesn't mean you can no longer backed down. By your standards, and you've now admitted, you have backed down... you just think it's okay because you done BZ before... sorry, you've backed down multiple times.... way more than me.