Piers Morgan on Trump

My post

Originally posted by Time-Immemorial
Ya and the current strategy is doing nothing. And you guys are a bunch of wimps as well. Yall can't even fight a war. Whats your excuse?

His Response

Originally posted by Quincy
Okay.

Can you tell me the difference between the US killing innocent families and ISIS killing innocent families?

My post said nothing about what he is asking. And thats the end of it. If you are going to take his side on this, then whatever.

That was considerably after the bit I pointed out to you where you implied that killing women and children was ok. Again, you started that.

Originally posted by Time-Immemorial
Oh I forgot, they can indiscriminately kill our women and children.

This is stating a fact. This is not stating my opinion or a general opinion.

This is a factual statement, and I will not change my position on this fact.

That statement implies you think it is ok to do it back.

And then when the 'two wrongs don't make a right' comment was made, you rejected it, implying again you thought it was ok to kill women and children in return.

I was talking about this

Originally posted by FinalAnswer
indiscriminate killing of men, women and children is slaughter, yes. This doesn't piss off just the terrorists, who cares about that, this pisses off the entire populace. People who would otherwise have no reason to join ISIS are now angry enough to do so.

Originally posted by Time-Immemorial
Oh I forgot, they can indiscriminately kill our women and children.

Oh you can properly quote now, interesting. I already made my position very clear.

TI That's the second time I quoted that in two pages.

Originally posted by Quincy
TI That's the second time I quoted that in two pages.

You only quoted it after I was already in a discussion with Ush and I did not see it, quit lying and trying to make it seem thats how you approached the subject, you did not, and that is a big fat lie. I never said it was ok to kill children, hence me not condoning what ISIS does.

What?

I'm lying because you didn't SEE me quote that?

Show proof that is how you started the conversation.

Originally posted by Quincy
So you want to out-isis isis

Originally posted by Quincy
hahaha

Originally posted by Quincy
Okay.

Can you tell me the difference between the US killing innocent families and ISIS killing innocent families?

Because I have proof this is how you started it.

You aren't even quoting me in the proper order? You are very intense.

If you want me to give me a second then

Kfish said this:

Originally posted by AlmightyKfish
There is y'know, leeway between 'doing nothing' and advocating and committing war crimes.

I quoted him and said this:

Originally posted by Quincy
hahaha

Originally posted by Time-Immemorial

Ya and the current strategy is doing nothing. And you guys are a bunch of wimps as well. Yall can't even fight a war. Whats your excuse?

And then I said this:

Originally posted by Quincy
So you want to out-isis isis

and then this:

Originally posted by Quincy
You want to be the MOST Isis

And then, you threatened to report me for "spamming and trolling." Realizing clearly there was a misunderstanding, I attempted to explain where it was that I WAS confused with your meaning, and I ask you for clarification.

Originally posted by Quincy
I'll re-word.

You consider a viable strategy of "defeating isis" is to kill their families because they kill our families. Do I misunderstand?

Then you reported me. Or at least say you did.

Thanks for proving me right.

My quote asked you what you meant with your responses, and then you got mad at me?

Originally posted by Ushgarak
Do I have to remind you again that I'm a conservative voter?

I'd like to add, drawing from my experience, I also have my doubts that you are totally impartial on political matters on this forum.

However, please do not treat it as an attack. It's simply an observation, especially given that I don't think it's possible to be totally impartial, even as an admin.

I would say that impression has been created because right-wing political views on this forum have effectively been hijacked by aggressive and often unpleasant posters and so I have had disproportionately to shut that side down.

Originally posted by Ushgarak
I would say that impression has been created because right-wing political views on this forum have effectively been hijacked by aggressive and often unpleasant posters and so I have had disproportionately to shut that side down.

I was informed by fellow posters that this forum had its fair share of trolls (not to name who exactly). Hopefully, we moved past that.

First Peirs Morgan ultra Liberal now supports Trump.

Now a Ultra Liberal Feminist Supports Trump

http://www.salon.com/2016/03/24/camille_paglia_this_is_why_trumps_winning_and_why_i_wont_vote_for_hillary/