Originally posted by marwash22
because American white men of a certain age label everything as "SJW" when it doesn't fall directly in line with their sensibilities
lol
Originally posted by marwash22
what would be "not so honorable" about purposely depicting women in a positive light as strong people?
I mean that up until a few years ago, Hollywood wouldn't touch female-led hero movies with a ten-foot pole, and not just because of Elektra and Catwoman, I imagine. But in the last few years we've seen a rise, especially in action movies (which tends to cross over with the superhero genre), of movies led by women.
While the movies might be good (WW, Mad Max) or awful (Ghostbusters), it does make me wonder what changed their attitudes so much.
Originally posted by Patient_Leech
I completely agree. I finished the movie and it's great (for the comicbook/superhero formula). Think they had to borrow a lot from Marvel, particularly Captain American and Thor, but they still used the Zack Snyder-esque action (except this time with some legitimate drama and emotion). I can't believe I was actually sort of wow-ed by some of the fight scenes. They were kind of fun. And the vulnerability of Diana made her much more interesting than most superheros. For that her woman-hood was probably essential. And the film felt much less SJW-inspired in the second half. The film kind of transcends its superhero nature to become a legitimately good movie.I think she and Chris Pine had great chemistry, but they should have shown them do a little more than just kiss. That was kind of dumb. These comicbook films tend to be a bit prudish.
I thought they boned in the hotel?