Originally posted by Arachnid1
X1 and 2 were retconned? It's not cherrypicking. I thought Singer was keeping his creations but getting rid of the movies that weren't his work. Why would he retcon his own movies?
Where was it specifically said that only Singer's movies were retconned? There was no such specification. The entire original X-Men trilogy was retconned. You can't remove an entire timeline and only affect particular stories in it. Heck the moviemakers even said the change in time line caused the mutants to be born at a different time. Which is why the new movie will have all the characters played by new actors.
Originally posted by 0mega Spawn
😂 by that logic lady Deathstrike doesn't exist for this thread to be possible
That's exactly what I am saying. The arguments can be basically summed up like this:-
OP: Wolverine gets feats from all moviesz
Me (and King): Then Wolverine wins since he's improved and has got better feats
Ara (and supporters): Deathstrike wins, since Wolverine has not changed
My side: No ( proceeds to list Wolverine's better feats from other movies including fighting more dangerous opponents than Deathstrike )
Ara: Nope. The other movies got retconned
Me: What? OP said
all movies or by that logic no Deathstrike fight occured at all
Ara: Nyah Nyah nuh nuh