I believe Maul has it in the bag. Superior physical, fighting style greatly optimized to target Dooku's style, and minimize Vader's edges, also the most versatile and tactical combatant of them all.
Of course ILS didn't pay me for this post, it's my entirely private and well-founded view - obviously normal people don't pay real money, even in Bitcoins equivalent of 0.50$, for support about fictional characters, it's totally ridiculous.
I have to say that by the end of it, the story was completely different than where we had started. I don’t want to necessarily promise something that doesn’t happen – the Vader/Maul thing is interesting at a fandom level. [But] the more compelling personal story becomes about Ahsoka and Vader.
http://www.starwarsunderworld.com/2016/03/star-wars-rebels-twilight-of-apprentice.html
What I read from that was Vader vs Maul was a cool and intended idea, but didn't make the final cut. Cause the story arc is really about Ahsoka vs Vader. *shrug*
Originally posted by |King Joker|True, it would be a missed opportunity if they never did.
Mmm, yeah, agreed.Kind of sucks -- would've given some people that 'gauge' for Vader that's necessary for them.
Maybe in season 3 we'll get it, because if Vader and Maul don't fight in TotA I doubt Maul will bite the dust on Wednesday.
Originally posted by |King Joker|
Reasons?
He's the most skilled out of the three, and I don't see how any of the other two can win. Maul is really the weakest here, and would be cut down first. Then it comes down to Dooku and Vader, and Vader is more skilled, has way more endurance, more strength, and overall better than Dooku.
Tbh Maul. He's much more agile than either opponent, with Dooku being at a severe disadvantage form-wise. Idk if he can cope with Vader's strength or Maul's speed/endurance. He'd go down first, and Maul can easily evade Vader and possibly (unlikely but not improbable) overpower Vader with his sheer endurance and agility.