Originally posted by Sin I AM
Can you show me where it'd been stated that (in dialogue or writer narrative ) that Clark is "weak" against magic more so than any other non magic entity.
We don't need a statement, we just can go by what we see. I never said he was weaker then some non magic being, what I said was he doesn't handle magic as well as he does non-magical attacks.
To which that actually isn't debatable and it's not something someone needs to say on panel because we just have a variety of examples of it. Normal fire wouldn't burn Superman or cause him any kind of discomfort, he wouldn't feel it. He felt the heat of the magic fire. Now of course a normal person would be killed by magical fire.
The "myth" as you call it is that magic affects Superman just like it does a normal person. That is not the case at all, normal people can't survive magical lightning or fire. But on the other hand magical lightning or fire has more of an effect on him then fire or lightning from a non-magical source.
But when it comes to mystical weapons it seems they *do* pierce his skin just as easily as it would any normal person. Which is why hurting him with a magically enhanced weapon isn't really noteworthy. What would be impressive is hurting him because you're just that damn strong.
Also remember: you agree with me. You just worded it differently. Acknowledging magic isn't his "thing" is more or less saying he doesn't handle magic as well as he does other kinds of attacks.