PoD Bane runs the Sith gauntlet

Nah. Exar's origins were impressive, he achieved tons of shit in his time, and he's stated to be superior to his predecessors.

Nadd was stated to be superior to Sadow though.

How's that? IIRC he just killed his spirit.

I put them roughly on par though, despite the quote.

Originally posted by NewGuy01
Nah. Exar's origins were impressive,

i.e. being the most prodigious jedi in the order?

Originally posted by NewGuy01
he achieved tons of shit in his time,

Achievement =/= ability to fight/raw power anyways.

Originally posted by NewGuy01
and he's stated to be superior to his predecessors.

Like Nadd's relationship with Sadow?

--------------------------

I'm sorry, I just don't see the difference with Nadd and any of the other ancient sith, as far as power is concerned. Most prodigious jedi in the order, lived another century increasing his knowledge of the dark side, created a blaster that killed more jedi than any lightsaber, was, "the greatest sith sorcerer who had ever existed," performed some pretty damn nice feats as a spirit, and died. He's basically Pre-Nathema Vitiate, except with saber skill and a more lasting impact millenia later.

I think Sas is sort of underestimating Nadd here, yeah. That being said, the legend behind Sadow is pretty clearly above Nadd's, and he makes a good point on how his spirit was the ***** of the top ancients.

Well, what do you mean by legend? From a certain point of view, the legend behind Revan is pretty clearly above Vitiate's, in and out of universe.

The Son of Mortis was a whiny ***** too.

The legend of Naga Sadow being pretty much represented as the poster-boy of the ancient Sith while Freedon Nadd is just a foot-mark in the history of Exar Kun.

And then obviously reference back to Nadd being a minion to Ragnos and friends.

You make a good point with Revan though. I'm simply throwing out ideas here.

Originally posted by DarthAnt66

Well yeah, he was far more powerful than Naga's spirit. 😬

Originally posted by DarthAnt66
You make a good point with Revan though. I'm simply throwing out ideas here.

👆

Legacy is important, just not here.

@Sasukedc: I feel the quote suggests Nadd's superiority to Sadow in general, not just when he had spirit limitations.

It's also worth noting it was later retconned so that Nadd killed Sadow's physical body, but the context of the quote doesn't really apply to that.

Wouldn't Nadd besting Sadow, albeit under completely unknown circumstances, suggest that he's his rival or superior though? mmm

Back. Civil War was pretty good.

Well your opinion in this thread isn't. 🙂

Cool bro. Want to debate it? 😛

I mean this isn't a formality, kek.

I don't really know how to go about it here. Usually when someone disagrees they say why and we converse about it till we both leave satisfied but people on KMC don't seem to be inclined to do so.

Even when their points are disproved it seems like they go back to them a few days later after most have forgotten.

If you disagree tell me why and try to convince me otherwise unless you don't think it's worth the effort. If that's the case I don't really see the point of commenting but then again that's your prerogative.

No one wants to debate you because your reasoning behind your arguments are terrible.

My argument:

Originally posted by DarthAnt66
There's no debate to even be made. It's just obvious. 😬

Barrier feats from Naga Sadow that shows he can handle Darth Bane's telekinesis, b0ss?

Originally posted by DarthAnt66
Barrier feats from Naga Sadow that shows he can handle Darth Bane's telekinesis, b0ss?

Not to mention the speed feats, kek. I don't think Sadow will even be able to perceive Bane. 🙂