Chinese Inctercept US Spy Plane

Started by jaden1013 pages
Originally posted by Time-Immemorial
No, but try and explain Obama's military aggression. Its interesting to see leftists do flips for china. Its becoming clearer why Trump is going to win, the China apologists are growing strong.

You stated that Obama is doing nothing despite the fact that I already told you about the US moving forces to 5 different airbases in the south China Sea specifically for the purpose of intimidating China. The US has no geographical reason to be anywhere near that part of the world. Like I said, if China was to strike a similar deal with one of the island nations off the coast of the United States and stated it was doing it to "rebalance" strategic interests the US would flip out.

So no. This isn't about being an apologist for China. It's about pointing out blatant hypocrisy.

Re: Re: Re: Chinese Inctercept US Spy Plane

Originally posted by Time-Immemorial
You have not been listening to anything Trump has been saying and your statement above is just your opinion. The person you just described is Hilary and Obama's policy thus far. In case you didn't know, 50% of Trumps campaign is being tough on China.

He talks about being "tough on China" with regards to trade, not with regards to a military standoff. Do you honestly think a guy who talks about making South Korea and Japan pay for US military support is going to make East Asia more secure against Chinese expansionism?

Originally posted by jaden101
I'd say the US opening 5 military bases in the south China Sea is as aggressive as anything China are doing.

.

Didn't the Phillipines ask for help recently due to the aggression in the the south china sea?

I don't know, I think building islands in the middle of the ocean in an attempt to control the region that isn't yours to begin with is worse then the US opening 5 bases.

Re: Re: Re: Re: Chinese Inctercept US Spy Plane

Originally posted by Omega Vision
He talks about being "tough on China" with regards to trade, not with regards to a military standoff. Do you honestly think a guy who talks about making South Korea and Japan pay for US military support is going to make East Asia more secure against Chinese expansionism?

Nonsense.

Originally posted by snowdragon
Didn't the Phillipines ask for help recently due to the aggression in the the south china sea?

I don't know, I think building islands in the middle of the ocean in an attempt to control the region that isn't yours to begin with is worse then the US opening 5 bases.

They did, but he missed that part or didn't understand it.

Originally posted by jaden101
You stated that Obama is doing nothing despite the fact that I already told you about the US moving forces to 5 different airbases in the south China Sea specifically for the purpose of intimidating China. The US has no geographical reason to be anywhere near that part of the world. Like I said, if China was to strike a similar deal with one of the island nations off the coast of the United States and stated it was doing it to "rebalance" strategic interests the US would flip out.

So no. This isn't about being an apologist for China. It's about pointing out blatant hypocrisy.

You seem rather bothered you came up with nothing and ended up being wrong, and you did not point out any hypocrisy.

Originally posted by snowdragon
Didn't the Phillipines ask for help recently due to the aggression in the the south china sea?

I don't know, I think building islands in the middle of the ocean in an attempt to control the region that isn't yours to begin with is worse then the US opening 5 bases.

So China building military bases in an attempt to control the waters next to its own country is worse than the US opening airbases in am attempt to control the waters next to someone else's country?

Originally posted by Time-Immemorial
You seem rather bothered you came up with nothing and ended up being wrong, and you did not point out any hypocrisy.

You're being intentionally stupid again. I'll presume this is the point when you say "it was a joke" again.

You tried arguing that The US put BASES In the SOUTH China sea was US aggression when we were asked to by another Country to halt and monitor Chinese aggression who would love to take back Tawian.

The joke is on you, friend.

Originally posted by Time-Immemorial
You tried arguing that The US put BASES In the SOUTH China sea was US aggression when we were asked to by another Country to halt and monitor Chinese aggression who would love to take back Tawian.

The joke is on you, friend.

The US stated themselves they were doing for their own strategic interests. Nice try.

The US protects its allies for its own stragetic nterests and theirs. Pretty sure Great Britian does the same.

Nice try, try again.

Originally posted by Time-Immemorial
The US protects its allies for its own stragetic nterests and theirs. Pretty sure Great Britian does the same.

Nice try, try again.


So you're admitting the US is using its military to control the waters around other countries

Aggression.

Want more proof. Here's a map of other bases or planned bases the US wants to surround China with

And here's ones Chinese bases around the US

you really have no clue what you are saying.

I guess you take patrolling the seas as aggression.

But you missed China intercepting our spy planes.

Originally posted by Time-Immemorial
you really have no clue what you are saying.

I guess you take patrolling the seas as aggression.

But you missed China intercepting our spy planes.

Like I said. Your wilful stupidity knows no bounds.

Same with you. You can't even stick to The OP.

Originally posted by jaden101
So China building military bases in an attempt to control the waters next to its own country is worse than the US opening airbases in am attempt to control the waters next to someone else's country?

So all the South China Sea is actually China's? From practically the coastline of the phillipines down to indonesia?

Not to mention the chinese military forces that deliberatly run off fisherman from vietnam/phillipines nearby nations that use said waters to fish in that aren't anywhere near china.

It's not just the USA ramping up India is taking part and Vietnam have ramped up presences now as well.

China is the antagonist here and the USA is just doing it s Team Amerika, World Police thing when several nations there asked for help as well.

Originally posted by Time-Immemorial
Same with you. You can't even stick to The OP.

That's exceptionally ironic coming from you.

Originally posted by snowdragon
So all the South China Sea is actually China's? From practically the coastline of the phillipines down to indonesia?

Not to mention the chinese military forces that deliberatly run off fisherman from vietnam/phillipines nearby nations that use said waters to fish in that aren't anywhere near china.

It's not just the USA ramping up India is taking part and Vietnam have ramped up presences now as well.

China is the antagonist here and the USA is just doing it s Team Amerika, World Police thing when several nations there asked for help as well.

Strawman argument.

That being said, China has more business operating in the south China Sea than the US does. The US has also already stated they're doing it to "rebalance" the strategic outlay in their favour. It has nothing to do with helping the poor little countries near China.

The US surrounds China will military bases yet China is the aggressor?

No

Originally posted by jaden101
That's exceptionally ironic coming from you.

People like you is why we left Britian. And then when you came to get us back. We beat you again and again.

Originally posted by jaden101
Strawman argument.

That being said, China has more business operating in the south China Sea than the US does. The US has also already stated they're doing it to "rebalance" the strategic outlay in their favour. It has nothing to do with helping the poor little countries near China.

The US surrounds China will military bases yet China is the aggressor?

No

Do you believe that China has the rights it has claimed throughout the China Sea, thats the primary concern.

If you believe it does then there we go.

If you believe it doesn't, how do you propose it be contained?

The US is reacting to the situation not the one creating the situation. Hence China would be the aggressors.