Could Darth Bane solo One Sith?

Yeah I'm waiting for it.

He's more powerful than sith who oneshots the most powerful member of the current jedi order, shurgs off getting a ship smashed in her face, mind ****s the leader of the imperial knights, TK huge satelite dish, ragdolls Krayt's Fist and later Hand who telekinetically stalemated Cade.

Anakin, who can manipulate huge ships with telekinesis and survive enormous falls like its nothing, struggled with a couple Tukata. Trainee Bane solo'd a dozen/half a dozen. Orbalisk Bane >>>>

Powerscaling!

Anakin was cocky and on a dark side nexus, so was Bane. There were 1000 years between them vs Wyyrlok flat out said to be more powerful across the board than people with feats I meantioned.

mmm

As if Orbalisk Bane wouldn't utterly shit on everyone you mentioned mmm

Prove it fagit, whom did Bane mind ****? Ragdoll? Oneshot?

Please stop going off topic/trolling my threads DMB

Originally posted by cs_zoltan
Anakin was cocky and on a dark side nexus, so was Bane.

Irrelevant given the vast disparities we're talking about here.

Originally posted by cs_zoltan
There were 1000 years between them vs Wyyrlok flat out said to be more powerful across the board than people with feats I meantioned.

mmm

Evidence that the Tu'kata changed at all in those 1,000 years? Unless you're arguing that a medium can't have inconsistency in and of itself, in which case, KEKLEL.

Wyyrlok had less difficulty with Andeddu cultists. That's the most direct comparison. Wyyrlok>Bane. Trufax.

Tbh fugg you. 🙂

You must continue to fight LeG's evil and protect the Last Dragonborn. 🙂

TBH, the Tukata feat is fugging ridiculous for comparisons. They range from the size of cars to the size of a small dog depending on the source 😬

Yeah, and different fighters have different approaches towards fighting them because of stylistic differences. It's a bit like saying Dooku can't replicate Obi-Wan's best blaster-fire deflecting feats, which makes him less skilled, when it's really a matter of form strengths and weaknesses.

Or Drew just takes liberties regarding the feats of his Gary Stu's, when we know Bane is pretty low on the totem pole compared to PT era. 😱

While I get the point, it isn't really anything to do with form strengths and weaknesses. One guy did better than another against the same enemy. Djem So doesn't give you a +5 bonus against Tukata.

Originally posted by Nephthys
While I get the point, it isn't really anything to do with form strengths and weaknesses. One guy did better than another against the same enemy. Djem So doesn't give you a +5 bonus against Tukata.

I know that, and the form advantages argument isn't necessarily restricted to or specifically applied against this example. I'm just saying its worth mentioning. That being said, usually something like this is too inconsistent to be used for cross-era referencing. You'd be assuming that every Tuk'ata is identical in strength, speed, size, durability, etc. Then there's differing portrayals between different authors, etc. As Temp has often said, Star Wars is a highly inconsistent mythology.

Chant it with me everyone: Feats don't matter! Feats don't matter! Des dies! Des dies!
This is a wonderful world!

Orbalisks = victory

Originally posted by hutchy1345
Orbalisks = victory

... for the One Sith, when they fry him with lightning, blast him with mind-sorcery, and such.

Heck, Krayt himself could kill them with dark transfer.