Originally posted by Time-ImmemorialRobtard tactics:
Proof?Nice moving goal posts after you cannot prove your point.
Okay, found it, here's one of the times where I said I don't agree with banning all guns:
Originally posted by Robtard
I don't think Obama wants to get ride of all guns, iirc, he's also for reform, like better background etc. If he is though, I don't agree. Source?
XYZ tries so hard but always fails.
No one interpreted the right as a means to ban all guns, so once again you fail. Just like the other, you see the words "gun regulation" and you kneejerk.
While Hillary will most likely be the next POTUS, you might want to wait until she's actually elected before you flip out over something she says.
ps She's not getting ride of guns either. People have been crying for 7+ years now over Obama's "war on guns/freedom" and you can still easily get guns
Okay, in all seriousness here, Hilary is talking about stricter gun laws to protect the people. The problem being, this will invite guns in illegal marketing.
I could go on and on about the right to bear arms when freedom is taken away, but it appears that happened a looooong time ago.
Regardless, Hilary will go for strict gun laws similar to what is seen in Europe and Australia. Does the USA want this?
"More than 33,000 Americans are killed by guns each year. It’s time to act. As President, I'll take on the gun lobby and fight for commonsense reforms to keep guns away from terrorists, domestic abusers, and other violent criminals—including comprehensive background checks and closing loopholes that allow guns to fall into the wrong hands." H.R. Clinton Jan 2016
Again, seems to be more about better gun regulation and not "they want all our guns!".
The NRA (and by extension gun manufacturers) freaking love whenever a president talks about gun law reform. They spin whatever is proposed and gun/ammo sales skyrocket.
Even if the NRA do that, Hilary is the master of spin and will inevitably infringe on gun owners' rights as opposing the government. The criminals aren't the ones who miss out, as I'm sure you understand with drug laws. Gun owners will lose out on arming themselves against tyranny, as has been happening over a long period of time.
Originally posted by Robtard
We've done this before a few times, last time I recall was when you were going on about Obama wanting to take away all your guns and I pointed out that the bill was for gun law reform, not taking away guns flat out, you insisted it was and I said "I don't agree with that", but again, it wasn't about that.
Good so no proof, CA.
You first tried to say the second amendment didn't give private citizens the right to bear arms and now you are back peddaling and moving goal posts and trying to change the subject.
Wont work.
DC vs Heller>your second amendment understanding/opinion..
Originally posted by Time-Immemorial
Good so no proof, CA.You first tried to say the second amendment didn't give private citizens the right to bear arms and now you are back peddaling and moving goal posts and trying to change the subject.
Wont work.
DC vs Heller>your second amendment understanding/opinion..
Posted.
Strawman.
Just stop.
Stop name dropping things you didn't actually read up on.