Pajamaboys in the whitehouse

Started by Surtur2 pages

I never said non-vegans haven't died on the climb, I was saying it was stupid to do something dangerous just to try to prove some point. Trying to prove vegans are not weak cost them their lives.

That wasn't what I was saying.

I imagine most of the 240ish people that died trying to climb Mt. Everest where climbing to prove something, probably prove that they could do it.

At least they didn't climb the Mt to force it to become a Vegan Mt.

So lets get down to it.

"Prolonged adolescence? Affluence? The disappearance of physical chores and muscular labor? The collapse of traditional liberal education and the triumph of the therapeutic mindset? Disdain for or ignorance of life outside the Boston–New York–Washington corridor? Political correctness as a sort of careerist indemnity that allows one to live a sheltered and apartheid existence? The shift in collective values and status from production, agriculture, and manufacturing to government, law, finance, and media? The reinvention of the university as a social-awareness retreat rather than a place to learn?"

Why intellectuals trying to run our country and tell the blue collar workers what to do,

Actual blue collar works and white collar like engineers and such.

They wake up every day and say an engineer has to build a bridge. If he does not build it right, what consequences could have tremendous impact and people could die.

A liberal professor can pettle and teach their ideologies in school to pass on to the next one and the next, without ever suffering the consequences of what the engineer could have to face.

So the people with actual responsibility are taking orders who practice a fictional theory and personal ideology.

I find it hilarious that someone uses the word "intellectual" as a negative.

This glorification of being stupid and ignorant is a problem, sure it has its place in comedy/satire, but it should stay there.

Nice dodge.

As to my actual statement:

Why intellectuals trying to run our country and tell the blue collar workers what to do,

Actual blue collar works and white collar like engineers and such.

They wake up every day and say an engineer has to build a bridge. If he does not build it right, what consequences could have tremendous impact and people could die.

A liberal professor can pettle and teach their ideologies in school to pass on to the next one and the next, without ever suffering the consequences of what the engineer could have to face.

So the people with actual responsibility are taking orders who practice a fictional theory and personal ideology.

Originally posted by Robtard
I find it hilarious that someone uses the word "intellectual" as a negative.

This glorification of being stupid and ignorant is a problem, sure it has its place in comedy/satire, but it should stay there.

I think it depends on the context. For example it doesn't mean you are necessarily saying you don't like someone because they are smart, but rather you dislike them because they are aware they are smart and thus seem to always think they are right and everyone else is wrong.

So that college professor that was calling on some muscle to remove a person recording who had the right to be there is an example of a negative kind of intellectual.

And whatever does that have to do with being an intellectual?

Originally posted by Robtard
And whatever does that have to do with being an intellectual?

It's the potential arrogance that comes with it. As I said it's not inherently bad.

Originally posted by Robtard
And whatever does that have to do with being an intellectual?

Liberal intellectual teachers have zero responsibility in life. They are actually life long failures who are teaching failed political ideology. Hence the students donating money to a pro hammas group.

Originally posted by Time-Immemorial
Liberal intellectual teachers have zero responsibility in life. They are actually life long failures who are teaching failed political ideology. Hence the students donating money to a pro hammas group.

That makes them pseudo-intellectuals.

liberals birthed this. president obama is a liberal. he attempts to reach out to liberals. this boy-man is a representation of who obama thinks liberals are. it's simple