Second Officer Aquitted of all charges in Freddy Gray Case

Justice Williams a black judge, who was around during the civil rights movement, acquitted officer Nero of all charges.

"BARRY GLENN WILLIAMS, Associate Judge, Baltimore City Circuit Court, 8th Judicial Circuit, since December 5, 2005. Judge-in-charge, Criminal Division, January 2, 2012 to January 2, 2015. Member, Technology Oversight Board, 2007-14. Chair, Criminal Justice Coordinating Council, Baltimore City, 2012-14. Member, Judiciary Task Force on Pretrial Confinement and Release, 2013-14.
Special Litigation Counsel, Civil Rights Division, U.S. Department of Justice, 2002-05 (trial attorney, 1997-2002). Assistant State's Attorney, Baltimore City, 1989-97."

http://www.nytimes.com/2016/05/24/us/baltimore-officer-edward-nero-freddie-gray-court-verdict.html?_r=0

http://www.baltimoresun.com/topic/crime-law-justice/barry-williams-PEGPF00124-topic.html

If anyone forget the story.

http://goo.gl/Hq56wN

Police kill a black man and get off. Not surprising.

So the civil rights judge made the wrong call? You remind me of bardock who still claims Michael Brown was innocent. I bet if i went back to the original thread I could find you making all these wild false accusations.

Pretty sure the medical examiner ruled it a homicide, sport

Full troll mode, i mean robtard.

It even says as much in one of the links you posted, sport

The state’s attorney for Baltimore City, Marilyn J. Mosby, filed the charges almost as soon as she received a medical examiner’s report that ruled Mr. Gray’s death a homicide, and a day after the police concluded their initial investigation and handed over their findings. Officials had cautioned that it could take considerable time for her office to complete its own investigation and decide whether to prosecute.

I was un aware that a medical examiner was above a judge and jury, robtard..I mean (re).

I wonder how a medical examiners report which could be bias and flawed is above a black civil rights judge's decision.

Its an interesting theory though robtard, I mean (re)

Easy fella, you're welcome to disagree and you're welcome to party and cheer that these cops are getting off free.

Easy, rtard. Explain how medical examiner > judge and jury,

Originally posted by Robtard
Easy fella, you're welcome to disagree and you're welcome to party and cheer that these cops are getting off free.

But wasn't there a witness in the van who said Gray was purposely throwing himself around the back, trying to injure himself so he didn't go to jail?

Did the medical examiner determine the wounds could of never ever been self inflicted?

Originally posted by Surtur
But wasn't there a witness in the van who said Gray was purposely throwing himself around the back, trying to injure himself so he didn't go to jail?

Yup

https://www.yahoo.com/news/witness-says-freddie-gray-trying-hurt-himself-baltimore-022916256.html?ref=gs

I also thought I read that Gray had previous back injuries, so it's likely he took a big problem and made it even worse by trying to injure himself.

Which just being injured shouldn't keep you from going to prison, so if true all I can conclude is the reason he was doing it was so he could try to claim the cops did it to him.

Originally posted by Time-Immemorial
Easy, rtard. Explain how medical examiner > judge and jury,

Guy, the story says that the officer opted out of a jury trial and allowed the Judge to make the decision.

Second paragraph of the story:

The officer, Edward M. Nero, sat with a straight back and stared forward as Circuit Judge Barry G. Williams, who ruled on the case after the officer opted to forgo a jury trial, read his verdict on the charges of second-degree assault, misconduct and of reckless endangerment.

Does posting something that I already read in the article prove you right? Or do you do that to try and get a win?

The first trial was a jury where the medical examiners reports where used there as well, the second trial was a judge decision. The judge was a civil rights judge.

Try and keep up.

Originally posted by Robtard
Police kill a black man and get off. Not surprising.

You're oversimplifying things here are you not?

Originally posted by Surtur
I also thought I read that Gray had previous back injuries, so it's likely he took a big problem and made it even worse by trying to injure himself.

Which just being injured shouldn't keep you from going to prison, so if true all I can conclude is the reason he was doing it was so he could try to claim the cops did it to him.

He had a spinal injury and was receiving a settlement.

Originally posted by Robtard
Guy, the story says that the officer opted out of a jury trial and allowed the Judge to make the decision.

Second paragraph of the story:

Can I ask why you think the judge made the decision to clear him?

Rob tried to lie and got caught. He tried to ignore the first trial was by jury and now conflating the issue.

Originally posted by Time-Immemorial
Does posting something that I already read in the article prove you right? Or do you do that to try and get a win?

The first trial was a jury where the medical examiners reports where used there as well, the second trial was a judge decision. The judge was a civil rights judge.

Try and keep up.

If by "first trial" you're referring to Officer Porter, that was a mistrial. Meaning it was left inconclusive.

No need, already way ahead of the game.