Originally posted by leonidas
no forgotten one went against thor as well iirc. he was later revealed to be gilgamesh and was in the avengers for a time. he was powerful, but i'd take billy. pretty sure gilgamesh was below icarus in terms of power, and i'd take billy over icarus as well.
Gil at his best would beat Billy IMHO.
Originally posted by leonidas
really? i don't recall ikaris saying that, but those issues are pretty old so i'll take your word for it. still, i put billy firmly in high herald, right there with thor, so i still don't see billy losing this one.
Originally posted by zopzop
Nah. Gil was more powerful than Ikaris and Ikaris admitted it on panel (don't know about now though). But Gil had one annoying weakness, he weakened the longer he was away from Olympia. It could even prove to be fatal (see the Avengers Inferno aftermath tie in). When he fought Thor he had been away from Olympia for a long while acting as a servant to the Celestials.Gil at his best would beat Billy IMHO.
Agreed, plus he has way more experience.
Originally posted by Blue Area Vet
Explicitly prove it. I don't recall that being the case.
Originally posted by Blue Area Vet
If he comes up with some bullshit like he did when he claimed Sun Eater drained Superman, I'm calling for his banning for Lying About Scans, 3rd offense.
Look at this pup, yapping around.
Read Thor 288-89 and then talk back to me kid.