Originally posted by Petrus
lol.
We know that three Kit Fisto level opponents would last a matter of seconds against the likes of Yoda, both from powerscaling off of Sidious and Yoda's own demo against a similar team. Yoda winning "easily" still leaves a lot of buffer space over "one-shots" - look to Sidious toying with Maul and Oppress, or Dooku tooling Obi Wan while dealing with a restrained Anakin (that was still > Kenobi), or even Vitiate owning the strike team.
Now, the Hero of Tython, presumably referring to SoR Hero, is so massively below Revan, it isn't really that funny. S/he and a strike team far more massive than this couldn't do shit against him until they had light side Revan's help. The Wrath and Nox don't make up a comparable team, and we could also figure that from their lack of feats to put them on the level of a team capable of matching Yoda.
Revan was clearly "easily" beating a superior team with some buffer room for the "easily" modifier. In order to suggest that Yoda couldn't do so as well, you'd have to argue that Revan is not only superior to Yoda, but superior by a wide enough margin to overcome that buffer, or otherwise has some special advantage.
Of course, we know that this isn't the case, because Revan is substantially weaker than Vitiate whereas Yoda matches a Sidious who is canonically more powerful, and also from their respective feats and accolades, Yoda's of which are better.
So, yes, by all the available evidence, Yoda does win easily. You are welcome to attempt a substantive rebuttal.