Rebels Tano vs Obi Wan

Originally posted by Selenial
"Kenobi can't last more than ten seconds. The Kenobi that did doesn't count because he's significantly weaker than any other iteration. Therefore prime Kenobi would last way less time."

Jmanghan logic everyone 👆

Like, most people put Anakin over Obi-Wan by that point in ROTS, right?

Vader is more powerful, and a better duelist then Anakin by ANH, right?

Rebels is clearly shortly before ANH due to Leia being an adult by that point.

Originally posted by Emperordmb
Aside from him driving her back the entire time and pushing her off a cliff?

watch?v=Nr7ufR7utEo

So, between 2:28 and 3:00??

Just gonna leave out the beginning and end??

Thats fine.

stop

omg.

embarrassing.

I always like when Vader's helmet is partially exposed, it makes his appearance more menacing because of that one eye that seethes with hatred, backed up by his foreboding appearance.

Originally posted by Jmanghan
She was fighting evenly with him, and was able to land a strike, even when Ahsoka has her back turned with her hands to her sides, Vader still couldn't get one over on her.

At the very least, shes a better duelist by that point in SW History... or maybe I need to rewatch the fight, because I don't remember Vader pulling one over her even once.

Originally posted by |King Joker|
stop

Then stop acting like retards and post some evidence that I'm wrong.

Because from what I've seen, all you guys are saying is "Lol, is he dumb?" "Wow, he's stupid for thinking that".

Then some guys like Nai and Stealth Moose re-iterate my point, which makes everyone simultaneously stfu just because its them.

None of you have a voice, you act like drones that reproduce arguments from other people.

^Lol is he dumb? Wow he's stupid for thinking that.^

Originally posted by Jmanghan
Then stop acting like retards

Right back at ya tbh.

lmfao

It's what you're posting

You: Show me when RotS Kenobi can fight Vader for 10 seconds and more
We: What about Ben Kenobi from ANH, kek
You: It doesn't count because ANH Kenobi was weaker
We: WTF, you're saying that, if weaker version of Kenobi can give Vader a good fight, it doesn't mean the stronger version of Kenobi can too

Originally posted by JKBart
lmfao

It's what you're posting

[b]You: Show me when RotS Kenobi can fight Vader for 10 seconds and more
We: What about Ben Kenobi from ANH, kek
You: It doesn't count because ANH Kenobi was weaker
We: WTF, you're saying that, if weaker version of Kenobi can give Vader a good fight, it doesn't mean the stronger version of Kenobi can too [/B]

Keep in mind, ANH takes place 6 months after Vader fought the Marek Clone.

pls stop, my health

Originally posted by Beniboybling
pls stop, my health

Its easy, just put your fingers on the keyboard, and press down on the letters and stuff.

Its not that hard.

Originally posted by Selenial
You're way too cocky for such a low tier debater 🙂

Originally posted by Selenial

I'm gonna keep responding to each and every post until someone posts somethjng, anything thats actually evidence against my claims.

EmperorDMB did it, and so did Bart.

Originally posted by Jmanghan
Then stop acting like a retarded moron and post something worth reading already.

Its easy, just put your fingers on the keyboard, and press down on the letters and stuff.

Its not that hard.

🙂

This can't be real.

Originally posted by Jmanghan
retarded moron

lol

Actually, this fella does have something resembling a point that Ahsoka acquitted herself extremely well against Vader.

That's about it, though. 👆