Originally posted by NaiSays the guy bringing up noncanon sources and violating the terms of the threads to let his bias run wild. You need to be put down Nai and I'm the man for the job.
I don't hold any beliefs. I deal in ideas. I have some regarding the Star Wars universe that may or may not be true. But if you want an educated creationist, look no further than to your role-model Tempest. 100 percent belief in the scripture, where it supports his ideas, 100 percent doubt where it doesn't. He's the Star Wars equivalent of a Westboro Baptist Church member.At least I am a human being, where you're just a troll. And now please go and do some chalk painting on the next highway. 🙂
Re: Nai vs Tempest vs Stealth Moose
Originally posted by Jmanghan
Who is the best debater of these three?
That's extremely subjective. Might as well ask everyone's favorite color while you're at it.
Recently Tempest beat Stealth Moose in a debate about Marka Ragnos.
Gideon's still dragging along the idea that ancient Sith are newbies because they have four panels of on-screen action and Ragnos is a Machiavellian pencil pusher.
I'll lose that debate when I succumb to dementia and begin flopping about in my own filth.
Nai and Stealth Moose are both big supporters of the Ancients in terms of power.
It's funny; I was never even aware of the ancients in terms of lore until late '05, 2006 perhaps. It took me a long time to read the scans of the comics in question and find out more, besides what little KOTOR/2 had told me. There's only two reasons why one would not support their claims to power; you don't like that aspect of EU (it is old and clunky) or you're a movie fanboy and EU which upsets the apple cart stresses you out.
I've tried to think of a third one but they all involve fallacies.
Who of these three is the best debater overall?
Honestly, Nai has the highest education level, the most classical or formal to boot, and has far more patience than any of us. On those merits alone, he should top this list.